In Eric Rohmer’s L’ami de mon amie, Blanche
and Lea, both in their early twenties, become friends; Blanche is single but
develops a crush on Alexandre, a man she meets through Lea, and who feels
nothing for her; Lea lives with Fabien but the relationship is bumpy, and then
while Lea is away, Blanche and Fabien connect and sleep together. The theme of
intertwining couples and mismatched desires is worthy of classic romantic
comedy, and Rohmer delivers a finale in that vein, in which each of the two
women misunderstands which man the other is referring to, a confusion that’s ultimately
happily resolved. The film is unusual in Rohmer’s oeuvre for its setting, the “new
town” of Cergy-Pontoise, an easy commute from Paris but a universe away in
terms of its modernity and artificiality and sometimes rather bizarre-seeming
concept of space. Cergy is conceived as a place one might barely ever have to
leave, with work and home and play all within precisely-curated walking
distance: Fabien refers to an occasion on which he ran into the same person
seven times while out and about, becoming increasingly frustrated about how to
respond, an anecdote that nevertheless in a way confirms the location’s
effectiveness in promoting connectivity. Even more than in some other Rohmer
movies then, there’s a sense here of social experimentation, that Cergy-Pontoise
ought to be productive territory for relationships, thus adding to the
characters’ frustrations at their own failures (Blanche’s crush on Alexandre is
presented as utterly absurd, and the moment when she finally realizes that he’s
more naturally drawn to Lea is quietly penetrating). Rohmer doesn’t seem
cynical about the setting though, his film marked by both fascination and
optimism, by a sense that the possibilities of Cergy at that time might have
been running ahead of the capacities of its occupants.
Tuesday, September 30, 2025
L'ami de mon amie (Eric Rohmer, 1987)
Wednesday, September 24, 2025
Searching for Mr. Rugoff (Ira Deutchman, 2019)
Ira Deutchman’s Searching for Mr. Rugoff is a modest
but cherishable piece of cinema history, packed with juicy anecdote and memoir.
The now seldom-mentioned Don Rugoff was an exhibitor and distributor, his
holdings including a group of upper East Side Manhattan theaters that embodied the
“arthouse” of the 60’s and 70’s (Rugoff was as responsible as anyone, for
example, for Lina Wertmuller’s short-lived preeminence). An emblematically
colourful and turbulent character, he habitually slept through screenings (which
didn’t prevent him forming strong opinions on what he’d missed) and had lousy
personal habits, possibly exacerbated by an untreatable tumor in his brain;
still, for a while he made a lot of things happen, with a flair for imaginative
publicity ideas (such as pumping up the prospects of Pumping Iron with
bodybuilding demonstrations in the theaters). The documentary’s title
references the somewhat extraneous Searching for Sugarman-type strand in
which Deutchman tries to track down a small-town cinema club which Rugoff ran
at the end of his life, the details of which have fallen into obscurity; while this
material illustrates the depth of Rugoff’s fall from visibility, that part of
the narrative would be amply clear regardless. Among the film’s notable
omissions is any detailed account of Rugoff’s distribution business, and its
impact on cinema culture outside New York, an absence that seemingly underlines
the narrowness of Rugoff’s core achievement. Even growing up around that time
on the other side of the Atlantic, I recall how largely that strand of Manhattan
cinemagoing loomed in one’s perception of various films, of what it was to be a
cineaste; as wondrous a moment in time as that was, it may seem in
hindsight that a culture rooted in such a geographically and sociologically
specific, and to most of us distant piece of the world, and bolstered by an
unsustainable amount of spending on stunts and overhead, might not have been
optimally built to last…
Wednesday, September 17, 2025
Gwaed ar y Ser (Wil Aaron, 1975)
As in the joke about the piano-playing dog, one was probably
never supposed to ask whether the 1975 Welsh-language Gwaed ar y Ser (Blood
on the Stars) is any good, it being miracle enough that it exists at all. Lasting
only about an hour, the premise is of a serial killer knocking off the line-up
for an upcoming night’s entertainment at a village hall, the joke being that
the victims were indeed at the time relative “stars” within the tiny confines
of Welsh-language culture. The film places an uncertain foot in the folk-horror
genre, the killer himself being less malign than the local kids’ choir that he
notionally conducts, the threat from which will seemingly outlive his
inevitable arrest. But any potential creepiness is swamped by a haphazard
shooting style, scattershot jokiness and massive tonal uncertainty, devoting
too much time to a way-over-the-top lead detective, and allowing minor
characters to prattle on at pointless length. As a medium for the Welsh
language, the film spans everything from ornate oracular eloquence to English-infused
vernacular, and it dispatches with its celebrities in a varied bunch of ways,
from a live-on-air DJ opening a package containing a deadly snake, to a folk
singer whose dead body is found painted green (a sight the camera dwells on
with particular relish), to a harpist electrocuted by her own instrument (after
she leads a visitor through a gluttonous and mostly very starchy-looking cornucopia
of local delicacies). Stuffed with in-jokes and references that probably barely
resonated with its target audience (to the extent that one can imagine one)
even at the time, the film was hardly designed to meet any kind of test of time;
the bizarre fact of it popping up fifty years later on a Canadian streaming
service seems then like a crazed vindication of sorts.
Wednesday, September 10, 2025
Caught (Max Ophuls, 1949)
Max Ophuls’ Caught follows the journey of Leonora Ames (Barbara Bel Geddes) and her relationship with two men placed at economic, social and emotional extremes from each other, the title seeming to refer primarily to the imprisoning gravity of money and the power it bestows. The film is driven by Leonora’s conflicted impulses and motivations: she enrolls in a “charm school” to increase her social effectiveness, takes a job as a department store model, and accepts an invitation to a party on a yacht belonging to the super-rich Smith Ohlrig (Robert Ryan), but her ambivalence and reluctance are often evident, and although she’s frequently criticized during the film for being preoccupied with marrying well, it appears to be more of an imposed attitude than a deeply-felt one. Ohlrig does marry her, but with equal lack of conviction, perhaps primarily just to prove a therapist wrong, thereafter wearing her down with his disregard. The film doesn’t demonize Ohlrig, showing him to be in the grip of various kinds of malaise, but in the end he simply fades from relevance, a structural choice intriguingly balanced by how the other man in Leonora’s life, an idealistic doctor for whom she takes a low-paid receptionist job after attempting to break from her husband and who helps refine her values doesn’t appear until almost halfway into the movie (notwithstanding James Mason’s top billing). There’s something rather startling about the film’s ultimate deployment of death as a necessary ultimate step toward redemption, its twist on the familiar intertwining of biology and destiny, the impact into the material world rippling outward (the final image is of a once-prized fur coat being carried away). And if not one of Ophuls’ very greatest works, Caught is (of course) consistently visually eloquent and striking, whether exploring the alienatingly vast interiors of Ohlrig’s Long Island mansion or the drastically contrasting no-place-to-turn East Side spaces.
Wednesday, September 3, 2025
The Widow (Nam-ok Park, 1955)
Nam-ok Park’s 1955 film The Widow is highly
worthwhile viewing, notable as the first Korean film to be directed by a woman,
and marked by its sympathetic treatment of female perspectives. Shin is a
single mother, widowed by the war, established in the early scenes as weighed
down by money problems but also as independent-spirited, not inclined to
settle; she’s financially assisted by an older acquaintance, but doesn’t sleep
with him, contrary to his wife’s suspicions. Meanwhile the wife herself has a
lover, Taek, who eventually in turn falls for Shin, their marriage plans
imperiled by the return of Taek’s old love, whom he’d assumed to be also dead.
The film’s examination of societal pressures on women evokes Ozu’s films of the
period, but the comparison (not an entirely fair one of course) rather
underlines The Widow’s lack of formal rigour and the relative softness
of its approach (perhaps summed up by the recurring use of Rogers and Hammerstein’s
Some Enchanted Evening). At the time of writing, the film can only be
viewed in a truncated version in which the second-last reel is without a
soundtrack, and the final reel is missing altogether, and although that’s
obviously objectively not for the best, it does lend what’s left a rather
singular vanishing quality. Just before the sound disappears, the film briefly
detours for the first time into becoming a musical, and then a narrative that
seemed geared toward a romantic coming together becomes one of separation, felt
all the more deeply for the silence, underlined by a series of shots of her
feet as she walks alone, and then later by a corresponding series of his feet,
and a final shot of Taek alone in the night, staring in the direction of his lost
love, the sudden imposition of the end seeming to define an absence and a
longing that can never be filled or mitigated.