Despite my great admiration for David Lynch’s films,
I’d never seen his famous Twin Peaks
TV series until recently, when we noticed the whole thing was available via
Rogers On-Demand and decided to go for it. We’re not into the binge viewing thing
you hear about now – it took us over six months to watch the thirty episodes.
This shouldn’t be taken to indicate any lack of enthusiasm though – I could
have spent much longer inside Lynch’s insinuating universe. Indeed, sometimes,
in moments of disequilibrium or disquiet, I find myself imagining it’s not the
TV show that ended, but everything else.
Who killed
Laura Palmer?
The show originally ran in 1990 and 1991, and even in
Britain, where I was living at the time, I remember the question of who killed
Laura Palmer sucking up a big chunk of media space for a brief period (although
the answer can of course be discovered now in two seconds online, I won’t
reveal it here, so as not to discourage readers from taking the journey for
themselves). The story begins with the discovery of the murdered homecoming
queen in a small town in Washington State, which soon triggers the arrival of
FBI Special Agent Dale Cooper (Kyle MacLachlan). It turns out Laura was mixed
up in much shady activity, yielding a range of suspects – from early on though,
it also seems the answer may not entirely belong to this world. The mystery was
solved partway through the second season – although only because of network
pressure, according to Lynch – and the focus then shifted to a new drama: an
ex-partner of Cooper’s turned bad, Wyndham Earle (Kenneth Welsh), who plots
revenge against him for a past transgression. The second season ends with
several unresolved cliffhangers, with Cooper in a perilous altered state and
several major characters possibly dead. Since the audience had all but vanished
by then, there was no third season.
Around the dark core of Laura’s story, the series
weaves other strands of intrigue, as well as much lighter, often downright
goofy material. Lynch himself pops up periodically as Cooper’s superior, who –
being profoundly hard of hearing – shouts at the top of his voice, except that
in one of the last episodes he can mysteriously hear a local waitress perfectly
well, and so doesn’t need to shout at her. This attunement to the possibility
of small mysteries and wonders, in the most mundane circumstances, runs through
the whole show. After an accident, an unhappy middle-aged woman regresses to
thinking she’s back in high school, and embodies the illusion so well that she
even reels in one of the leading jocks as her boyfriend. More mundanely, but
very engagingly, Cooper never seems to lose - despite his heavy preoccupations
- his enthusiasm for the quality of the local coffee and pastries.
Fire Walk with
Me
The show amiably evokes the eccentricities and
preoccupations of small-town life: beauty pageants, local campaigns, harmless weirdos
(the best known being a woman who carries and converses with a log). But the
foundations are severely compromised, not just by evil men and by personal
weakness, but by international conspiracies of virtually Bondian scope, and
increasingly by the intrusion of the unknown and unchartered (had the series
continued, it would have been no surprise if the town had turned out to be
built on the site of a long-buried alien spaceship, or something like that).
A lot of this is mumbo-jumbo of course, with the clear
sense of being made as it goes along (which Lynch was nicely candid about in
the interview book Lynch on Lynch). A
plotline that came and went about Cooper being framed seems somewhat
perfunctory (despite involving a cross-dressing David Duchovny), and I wasn’t
that enthused by the Wyndham Earle strand. But for all the bumpy history, the
purity of Lynch’s delight in innocence and goodness, even as he can’t help
himself from placing it under perpetual threat, gives it a pleasing coherence.
The year after the show ended, he made a movie, Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me. Rather
than wrap up the loose ends (he admits to having been less personally invested
in the second season), he returned to the original mystery of the troubled
girl, “radiant on the outside but dying inside.” Sheryl Lee – who appeared in
the TV series only as a corpse, in flashbacks and visions, and for a few
episodes as Laura’s cousin – now occupies the centre, as the film tracks the
last days of her life, after first dramatizing an earlier, related murder
investigation involving Cooper, which was mentioned but not deeply probed in
the series. The film wasn’t well-received, and Lynch’s vague plans of returning
to the material again went nowhere.
Lynch had
disappeared…
Funnily enough, I did
see the film when it came out – a rather senseless decision for someone with no
knowledge of the preceding show. Understandably, I was largely mystified by it.
Watching it again the other day (now in full knowledge of what came before, as
one should be) I was struck by how scrupulously it intersects with the facts
established in the earlier episodes, but even more by the depth of its plunge
into the darkness engulfing Laura and her family (much more explicitly rendered
than network TV would allow, and with greater Freudian richness) – in its
closing stretch, the film is little more than pure misery, turmoil and trauma.
This, it seems, is why even many of the series’ remaining fans hated it. But I
found Fire Walk with Me rather
movingly conscientious, if that’s the word, in its refusal to ingratiate
itself. Quentin Tarantino probably spoke for many when he said of the film: “David Lynch had disappeared so far up his own ass that I
have no desire to see another David Lynch movie until I hear something
different.”
Well, there
hasn’t been a David Lynch movie for seven years now, and there’s no clear
prospect of getting another one, although he continues to generate occasional
shorts and other art projects, and was a very memorable guest star in a few
episodes of Louie. According to a
recent New York Times interview, he
spends much of his time teaching and promoting transcendental meditation. When
I reviewed his last film Inland Empire
here, I quoted one writer’s assessment of it as “a
film that exists for itself and for its maker, not necessarily for us.” It’s
not hard to know what he means (a more eloquent expression of what Tarantino
said, perhaps), but of all American filmmakers, Lynch may long have been the
least preoccupied by what it might take to keep “us” intrigued, let alone
entertained. It’s just a miracle of birth and of art, I guess, that he makes it
so compelling to submit to his sensibility rather than your own, even if that
sometimes frightens you.
No comments:
Post a Comment