(originally
published in The Outreach Connection
in May 1999)
I am no great symbol
of any aspect of corporate culture, but the new satire Office Space catches me at a convenient time in my personal
history. After twelve years on the ladder, I recently quit, and at the time of
writing I’m serving out an extended notice period. I have a feeler on another
job, representing a modest change of direction, but it may very well not work
out, in which case I’ll be looking in the short term at unemployment. What
could have possessed me? Frustration, arrogance, idiocy, idealism? Certainly
all of those. But perhaps it was primarily an act of imagination. I’d been
complaining for years on and off about my career track, and how I felt I was
painting myself into a corner, but it kept meeting various objective measures
of success, so I kept going. I needed to evolve a vision of how to quit, to approach my dilemma
creatively, to craft a vision of how my soul would hold up under all the
alternative scenarios. After that it became easy, even inevitable. Right now I
feel great. Of course, that may not last (see above comment re unemployment).
Downsize this!
This all gives me a
greater than academic interest in the central conceit of Office Space: the idea of packing it all in, of not playing the
game anymore. Variety predicted in
its review that the movie might become a cult comedy for office workers, with
repeat viewings tacked on to happy hour. I went to see it on a Friday lunchtime
– a perfect time to spot such individuals playing hooky (I hasten to clarify
that in my closing days on the job I’m being paid only for a 75% week, making my
own presence there quite legitimate). But there wasn’t a tie or briefcase in
sight. Of course, casual Fridays are so pervasive now that it’s hard to tell
who’s working and who’s en route to the golf course. I’ve always refused to do
casual Fridays. Before I quit, that was my primary act of rebellion (that and
the Exposed movie poster in my
office), and you know you’ve been around too long when your primary act of
rebellion involves choosing to wear a tie.
Anyway, the central
character of Office Space, drowning
in a monotonous corporate culture, finds himself suddenly liberated, to the
point of recklessness, after an overstimulating hypnotherapy session. He starts
coming in to work only when he feels like it, speaking his mind without caring
about the consequences, dressing casually (and I don’t mean business-casually).
He just doesn’t care anymore. But instead of getting him fired, even as the
firm downsizes ruthlessly around him, his candor and individuality earn him a
promotion. Not that it makes him care a jot more. When his by-the-book
buttoned-down buddies get the axe, the three decide to take their revenge by
ripping off the company. And then there’s more plot-driven kind of stuff.
The grass is greener
When you hear that
his new attitude also enables him to reel in Jennifer Aniston as his romantic
interest, you may guess that Office Space
allows itself a little too much latitude in the area of wish fulfilment. The
film’s early stretches contain some reasonably effective potshots at the usual
Dilbert-type targets, but the second half is little more than an extended
wrap-up (with developments such as his break-up and reunification with Aniston
leaving as much impression as an empty toner bag). And if there’s a message
more profound in there than that corporate life kind of sucks and it’d be kind
of neat to do your own thing, it bypassed my in-tray.
But there are
obvious reasons of self-preservation for why most of us stay at our desks.
Maybe Office Space is just a big
whine about the grass being greener (it persistently mocks a waiter who
immerses himself too ingratiatingly in his restaurant’s upbeat ethos, but
what’s wrong with adapting to your situation?) I don’t want to get all pious
about this, but another new film reminds us how lucky we are to have the desk
and the commute and, maybe most of all, the air conditioner. In October Sky, based on a true story, a
teenage boy dreams of escaping from his dire home town, where a career down the
local coal mine is taken to be as inevitable as night following day. It’s 1957,
the time of the Sputnik launch, and the protagonist and his friends start to
experiment with homemade rocket science.
Alternative histories
This has the
practical upside of providing a possible ticket to the science fair, a winning
scholarship, and escape. But much of the film’s surprising emotional punch
comes, I think, from the potency of the recurring images of the homemade
rockets – once they’ve got them to work – traveling crisply into the heavens,
their scissor-straight tails slicing the blue sky. It’s a compelling, sleek
evocation of limitless escape, touching as a contrast to the soul-destroying
grimness of the town. The movie gets so much play from the wretched existence
represented by the mine (embodied through a standard-issue conflict between
blinkered father and dreaming son) that it’s almost Dickensian, although in the
end – perhaps aware of the dangers of condescension to the blue-collar segment
of the audience – it makes a game attempt at asserting that the mining life
isn’t inferior; it’s just different.
No comments:
Post a Comment