(originally
published in The Outreach Connection
in October 1998)
I'd never use this
space to advance a personal grievance of course, so it’s as a matter of
objective commentary that I report on the Toronto film festival’s refusal to
issue me a press pass for this year’s festival. Well, they didn’t actually
refuse – they just ignored my request. I thought a circulation of 12,000 might
have counted for something, but maybe, gentle readers, you just don’t seem arty enough. But I shouldn’t blame you.
My cultural credentials were shot as soon as I gave Lethal Weapon 4 twice the rating of Smoke Signals. They were probably worried I’d be a conspicuous
lowbrow – a dissenter chanting “Jackie Chan rules” during Bernardo Bertolucci’s
press conference.
The movie vigil
Anyway, I didn’t
want to go to the festival any less because of this painful snub, so I got up
at 4 am on September 3rd and hauled myself over to College Park to
stand in the ticket order line. If you’ve never been part of it, the film
festival involves a highly complex ordering process that entails visiting the
box office on at least three separate occasions. The key date is that on which
– two days after announcing the film schedule – they collect advance ticket
orders. These are processed on a first come, first serve basis, starting at 9
am, but given the festival’s popularity, all the best movies would already be
sold out if you actually turned up at that hour. Some people arrive the
previous evening and spend the night. Arriving at 4.30 am, there were well over
a hundred people in front of me. The line ultimately circled the south side of
College Park, then trailed up Yonge, west on College, down Bay at least to
Gerrard, and even further south for all I know.
My early start paid
off – I got ninety-five per cent of the movies I wanted. But many of those who
struck out will undoubtedly make an earlier start next time. I go an hour
earlier every year and never make up any ground. I dread the day when I feel
obliged to spend the night there (now you start to see how my interest in
getting the press pass might not have been wholly altruistic), but how far off
can that be? Still, although I’m not any
sort of morning person, and the street got pretty hard on my rear end (wiser people
bring folding chairs), the time passed surprisingly quickly, eavesdropping on
others in line and diligently reviewing an extremely long and dull but somewhat
important work-related document (I was really pleased with that aspect of it –
I got to charge virtually the whole stint!)
The cinematic zoo
My big gripe is that
the incredible enthusiasm for obscure movies that erupts in Toronto for ten
days each September seems disproportionate to the general year-round appetite
for such films. Last year I tried to get tickets to an afternoon showing of
Gary Oldman’s Nil by Mouth, but it
had already sold out. I eventually saw it commercially six months or so later –
me and the four other people in the theater. The picture lasted a mere two weeks. How do you reconcile those two
extremes of audience interest? The Cinematheque Ontario regularly shows
wonderful, rare movies by cinema’s greatest directors, to half-empty theaters.
I appreciate that it’s easier for people to fill their quota of challenging
cinema in one dose – take the week off and cover the waterfront. But that’s not
much of a place for art cinema in the scheme of things – to be experienced
primarily in a concentrated tumble of sleep-deprived viewing excess.
Roger Ebert recently
pointed out that the film festival circuit is becoming, in effect, the primary
means of exhibition for more and more foreign films. I think the Toronto
festival has enough clout in these parts to be a bit of a bully. Instead of
giving the best ticket selections to those willing or able to wait in line the
longest, why not give priority booking to people who’ve been to the
Cinematheque at least ten times during the year? You can debate the pros and
cons of that, but at least it would characterize the festival as being rooted in
– and the high point of – a thriving film culture, rather than as a short-lived
annual explosion. It’s in danger of resembling a cinematic zoo – wildly popular
for its many strange and exotic exhibits, but of little or no relevance to the
survival of those species in their natural habitat.
And you know I’m
sincere about that. What axe could I possibly have to grind?
Among the masses
Anyway, my original
idea was to cover the festival highlights in these pages, but I guess they
didn’t want me to do that, so let’s head back into the commercial jungle and
the current Slums of Beverly Hills. A
film far more accomplished than its raucous trailer and Adam Sandler-ish title
suggest, it’s about an economically-stretched father of three, played by Alan
Arkin, and his family’s ups and downs in the down-at-heel outer regions of B.H.
The film’s raunchy energy is much better rooted in a meaningful plot and
worldview than were the bad-taste selling points of There’s Something About Mary. For instance, a scene where two women
(well-played by Natasha Lyonne and Marisa Tomei) dance around the room while
throwing back and forth a vibrator is titillating and laugh-out-loud funny, but
it’s also a perfect expression of how Tomei deliberately draws the younger
woman toward sexual awareness, despite the fragility of her own state. And the
end of that scene, with Arkin entering the room and catching his daughter
enjoying the vibrator a little too much, may be predictable, but – along with
just about everything else in the picture – has an accomplished light touch.
The ending is
sentimental, but very level-headed – the family doesn’t get out of the slums. I
wouldn’t have wanted it any other way. I wanted the hand-to-mouth experience to
triumph. Shut out from the film festival’s equivalent of the great mansions,
naturally my only option is to enjoy the communal experience of the
proletariat. And I really do enjoy it. The press pass would have been pretty
neat. But the main thing – whatever it takes – is to see the movies.
(2018 postscript – I did receive a press pass
the following year, and held on to it for a decade. You can read many of the resulting
reviews on this website. But I haven’t seen a single film at the festival since
2009).
No comments:
Post a Comment