Thomas McGuane’s 92 in the Shade is, often simultaneously,
a film made out of almost nothing (even at a late stage, it spends extended
time observing one minor character instruct another in the names of fish) and
one driven by profound existential tension: somehow, the meeting of the two
creates something rather uniquely gripping, its essentially irresolvable
quality indicated by the existence of two versions with alternate endings (I’ve
only seen the bleaker and I imagine more haunting of the two). Peter Fonda
plays Skelton, aspiring to become a Key West fishing guide, blowing up a boat
owned by Warren Oates’ Dance as revenge for an elaborate practical joke; Dance
then vows to kill him unless he quits the business. Skelton doesn’t seem to doubt
Dance’s resolve, but keeps going anyway: it sums up the film’s evasive charm
that one can hardly guess to what degree he’s driven by fatalism versus
self-confidence versus idiocy, et cetera. The film frequently cuts off scenes
that feel like they could have gone on longer, or refers to incidents and conversations
that one might typically expect to have been part of the movie: while that
could be held up as a failure of craft (Fonda for one was unhappy with the
editing), it also lends it a kind of goofy authenticity, a sense that we’re peering
into sometimes near-random chunks of the sunbaked intertwined lives. The fine
and happy-seeming cast includes a blissfully unhinged Burgess Meredith (who
even more than most of the others seems to be making it up as he goes along,
especially in his scenes with Sylvia Miles), a wonderfully light-spirited
Margot Kidder, Elizabeth Ashley demonstrating her baton-twirling skills, and William
Hickey, recounting how he failed dismally at operating a whorehouse; it says
something that Harry Dean Stanton has trouble stealing any scenes.
No comments:
Post a Comment