skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Lino Brocka’s Insiang is a sensational tale of oppression
leading to unleashed self-determination, drawing on classic melodrama structures
of identification and sympathy while entirely rooted in its challenged time and
place (the mid-70s Manila slums, and apparently filmed in just eleven miraculous
days). Setting the tone with stomach-churning opening images from inside a slaughterhouse,
it then plunges us deep into a vividly sweaty setting of claustrophobic, gossipy
community and wretchedly strained economics, with the title character (beautifully
played by Hilda Koronel) gradually emerging as a focal point from within a
large, chaotic extended family. Insiang’s mother kicks out the relatives so that her
much younger lover can move in, but his real desire is for Insiang; he rapes
her, and when Insiang tells her mother, she gets slapped for it, blamed as a scheming
temptress. After her one escape plan – to get married to a boy who says he
loves her – ends in yet more mistreatment, Insiang gradually hones a capacity
to control her sexuality, while planning revenge over all those who’ve wronged
her, all the way to inciting murder. Brocka’s filming of the climactic event is memorable,
intercutting Psycho-like knife strokes
with Insiang’s possessed expression as she watches what she’s wrought, evoking (a
couple of years in advance) Amy Irving in The
Fury as she conjures up her destructive supernatural powers. But there’s no
pretense here that this solves anything: in the final scene she’s entirely
alone, her prospects in the community and sense of herself unspecified and unclear.
A quieter, sadder film takes place around the edges of the narrative, of young
people with dreams of something better but no ready way of realizing them,
either struggling along in menial jobs or else just hanging around getting
drunk; even the mean-spirited, shrewish mother and her thuggish boyfriend are
shown to be motivated by real vulnerabilities.
Perhaps on its
release in 1985, Dick Clement’s Water was able to draw some wan
resonance from then-recent memories of Falklands-bound battleships and US
support for Nicaraguan contras: if the colonial worldview it presents is
outdated and teetering, it’s clear the film’s movers and shakers haven’t
entirely realized that yet. The movie posits a Caribbean island of no strategic
or economic interest, such that Britain has all but forgotten it’s part of the
empire – Michael Caine plays the governor, long gone to seed (the movie’s soft
touch is embodied in how the island appears colourful and easygoing, embodied
by Jimmie Walker as the local radio host and by the prevalence of ganja,
although the dialogue suggests we ought to be looking at utter squalor).
Picking up rumours of possible insurgency and lacking the will to go through
another Falklands-type conflict, Margaret Thatcher directs that the island’s
population simply be moved elsewhere (to locations with hotels in need of cheap
labour), but things ramp up when a group of Americans discovers that a long
tapped-out oil well is now gushing a super-high-quality mineral water (which,
in turn, attracts the interest of the French as well, detecting a threat to
their own interests; there are also Cubans in the mix, but they eventually run
off to Miami to become drug dealers). No doubt there’s some satirical point to
how the debate about the island’s future never involves the islanders
themselves – even the rebel leader is white (Billy Connolly, with an
undisguised accent) – but the movie embodies the disregard as much as it
parodies it. Compensations are few – certainly not the
disengaged Caine or the barely-registering Valerie Perrine or the
way-over-registering Brenda Vaccaro. Maybe the funniest joke is that the
decision-making of the UN General Assembly should or would have been swayed by
a George Harrison and Ringo Starr guest appearance…
Even allowing
that Dreyer disowned Two People, it’s
strange it receives quite so little attention in discussions of the director;
it’s fascinating in its failure, feeling tonally and thematically linked to the
two features he made subsequently. The film focuses on a young married couple
under extreme strain: they’re the only faces we see, although there are other
voices, and it’s set entirely in their apartment, although it evokes other
spaces in various ways. Arne is an up and coming scientist who’s been publicly
accused of plagiarizing an older professor (stealing his cure for schizophrenia,
no less); in the midst of the (improbably headline-grabbing) scandal, the news
comes that the professor has been murdered, with numerous clues pointing toward
Arne as the perpetrator. Marianne tries to lend her support, but eventually
reveals her own tangled involvement with the dead man. The narrative lurches
around, cramming far too many reveals and reversals into its 70 minutes: it
makes no sense that signposts of guilt keep flooding in from the outside world (for
example, they learn from the radio that the police found a glove with Arne’s
initials on it) while no one in authority comes to interview the couple, and
yet this contributes to the sense of an intimately sealed-off world, bending
external reality to its own precepts (tbe professor is heard only in a single
flashback, and then seen only in shadow, as if harking back to Vampyr, and the lead actor’s occasional
resemblance to Bela Lugosi inadvertently – presumably it was inadvertent - contributes
to a sense of creepiness). In its ultimate capitulation to a transcendent love
that justifies almost all, Two People
looks ahead to Dreyer’s final film Gertrud,
but the journey is inadequately articulated here, with the ending feeling more
like an arbitrary twist than anything else. Stylistically though, the film
often does feel close to Gertrud, carrying
an air of devout, stark observance, and for all its manifesr weakness, it casts
a strange if broken spell.