Kenneth Lonergan
shot his film in Margaret in 2005,
and then entered six years of hell – he had trouble editing it into shape and
there were endless disagreements over its length, the producers sued each other
and him, and the delays kept bleeding resources he didn’t have. It finally came
out at the end of last year, in a two-and-a-half-hour version, and although it
had some passionate supporters – some called it a masterpiece, the year’s best
film – it made pitifully little money. It’s now available on-demand and on DVD
– the DVD also features a three-hour director’s cut, but I’ve only seen the
shorter version.
Margaret
I don’t think I’d
quite call it a masterpiece, but it’s a fascinating film, entirely engrossing,
with a texture recalling the great mature American cinema of the 1970’s. Anna
Paquin plays Lisa, a Manhattan private school student, living with her mother,
a successful theatrical actress. On a quest to buy a cowboy hat for an upcoming
vacation, she sees a bus driver wearing the perfect model; trying to get his
attention, she distracts him, he runs a red light, and kills a woman crossing
the street. Lisa, the only witness, initially tells the police the light was
green, but she later regrets it; when her revised statement can’t get the case
reopened, she looks for another course of meaningful action. It opens up a
legal and ethical tangle, something that for all her mouthiness, she lacks the
sense to orient herself within. Through numerous classroom scenes where the
students debate literature, America, and the shape of the post-9/11 world, her
personal confusion reflects a broader incoherence, the lack of any clear frames
of moral and ethical reference.
The
film makes its greatest impact in spurts, in moments of squirmingly real
interaction – Jim Emerson on his Scanners
blog said: “I've never seen a film that dissects with such precision just how hard
it is to have a meaningful conversation, to actually communicate what you want
to say to another person, and to hear and process what they are saying.” Of
course, this is a near-universal condition, the raw material of a thousand
alienated teenager movies, but Margaret
(very finely acted by all) is at times almost eerily attuned to Lisa’s psyche,
from her self-conscious would-be eloquence at certain times, to her incoherent
rages at others.
Thwarted
Masterpiece?
In a New York Times magazine
article titled “Kenneth Lonergan’s Thwarted Masterpiece,” the writer Joel
Lovell says: “There’s something in
the very conception of Margaret, in
the themes it most ambitiously pursues, that defies perfection…ever-widening
and interconnected circles of lives, their private dramas constantly thrumming
and colliding. Yes, it’s a big, messy, problematic film. And it’s one that,
with a precision and insight and empathy and large-heartedness you almost never
find in movies anymore, captures the bigness and messiness and problematicness
of life, and does it in a profound and lingering way.” But I’m not so sure. My
favourite moment in the film comes during one of those classroom scenes, where
a teacher played by Matthew Broderick leads a discussion of Gloucester’s remark
in King Lear – “As flies to wanton
boys are we to th' gods, They kill us for their sport.” He slams into a pupil
who insists on the unknowability of
the gods’ motives, and of whether human activity occupies any of their
attention, rather than on the teacher’s more conventional version of its
meaning, reflecting their conscious misuse
of humanity. The teacher retreats into near-wordless anger, gripping his juice
box as though he’s received a glimpse of hell: the playing field suddenly seems
to have become vast and frightening.
For the most part though, Lonergan struggles to maintain such an
existential charge. The film features rather too many slow-motion shots of Lisa
walking, and rather too many pans across city architecture, as if it could
invest itself with meaning by taking a deep breath and waving it in. Near the
end, Lisa tells two of her teachers she had an abortion the previous week –
something we haven’t seen depicted in the film, and which we don’t objectively
know to be either true or false. The longer version apparently features a scene
in the abortion clinic, confirming her story: omitting this information from
the film seems to extend the theme about the malleability of truth, even
allowing the possibility that Lisa might have lost her marbles completely. But
obviously, the truth about the abortion isn’t inherently unresolvable in the
way of a moral or ethical question: it’s just that the movie artificially
withholds it from us, as if in a case of a wanton boy toying with flies – a
ploy better suited to a detective thriller than a serious contemplation. For
all the time it took to get the movie out, it still feels in the end like
Lonergan might have been about to give the pieces another shuffle.
Can it be saved?
The final – rather flat - scene takes place at an opera, which seems to
indicate something of the film’s intended scope, but I couldn’t help thinking
of other sprawling films that have struggled to be seen as their creators
intended, such as Sergio Leone’s Once
Upon a Time in America. That film (originally released at 149 minutes;
later restored to a 229 minute version that still feels weirdly truncated in
places; now extended to a 269 minute version) seems to spawn potentially
endless oddities and complexities – it certainly deserves the term “operatic.” For
another reference point, I thought of the astonishing behavioural pirouettes
and narrative swerves of a film like John Cassavetes’ Love Streams (why has the dog suddenly seemingly changed into a
man?). It’s not fair to Lonergan no doubt, but still, Margaret seems overly linear and earthbound by comparison,
certainly stepping up to “the bigness
and messiness and problematicness of life” – and you truly have to admire it
for that – but fairly completely defeated by it (even allowing that anyone
would be).
Still,
it’s easily one of the contemporary films most deserving of your time. I saw it
the day after the shooting at the Colorado movie theatre showing The Dark Knight Rises, as Warner
Brothers was canceling its Paris premiere and suspending its reporting of box
office results, as if this indicated any meaningful respect for victims of
urban sickness, when the crucible for the event (not its direct cause of
course, but hardly a random venue for it either) was a showing of a massive
commercial investment in an enterprise that whips people up into an
anticipatory frenzy for narratives of sickening present-day violence and mythic
vigilantism. The whole thing, coupled with the hypocrisy of Obama’s banal “life
is very fragile” reaction, while refusing even to devote a token sentence to
gun control, just about turned me off the whole industry. If it deserves to be
saved, films like Margaret provide a
large part of the reason.
No comments:
Post a Comment