Every ten years
since 1952, the British film magazine Sight
and Sound has polled critics and historians on the best films of all time.
I’m pretty sure this used to be of limited interest to anyone other than Sight and Sound readers (a small group,
needless to say), but given changing times, the Internet was all over this
year’s iteration (the results of which, for instance, were live-tweeted). Orson
Welles’ Citizen Kane had been in
first place since 1962, but I think most people expected a change, and so it
came to pass: the quasi-official best film of all time is now Alfred
Hitchcock’s Vertigo (which was second
last time). Here’s the entire top ten: Vertigo,
Citizen Kane, Tokyo Story (Ozu), La
Regle du jeu (Renoir), Sunrise
(Murnau), 2001: a Space Odyssey
(Kubrick), The Searchers (Ford), Man with a Movie Camera (Vertov), The Passion of Joan of Arc (Dreyer), 8 ½ (Fellini).
No Play Time
Naturally, there
were as many reactions to this as there were people reacting. My own reaction
was that apart from some internal shuffling, the list was surprisingly similar
to last time: seven of the ten were unchanged and two of the new entries had
been on the top ten in past decades, the only “new” entry is Man with a Movie Camera, made in 1928!
Having said that, I couldn’t have thought of too many other films that seemed
likely to make it up there. If I’d had to make a guess, I might have put some
money on Jacques Tati’s 1967 film Play
Time, but that was at number 42, so I was way off.
And yet, maybe not
so far off. Play Time received 31
votes, which sounds meagre when you know that 846 people voted (each submitting
a list of ten). But the tenth film, 8 ½,
only received 64 votes, and Vertigo
took the crown with 191 votes, representing just 22% of the participants. So
there’s really little consensus here on anything, beyond the enormous depth and
richness of cinema history – over 2,000 films received at least one vote.
Of course, I’m far
too minor a figure to have participated, but I played with this subject in an
article a couple of years ago. Although I’m sure the list I came up with would
change every time I thought of it (I’m not sure how I left Rivette and Bresson
off there, other than just the hellish constraint of keeping it at ten), this
is still a pretty good snapshot of my view of things: F For Fake (Welles, 1973), The King of
Comedy (Scorsese, 1982), Late
Spring (Ozu, 1949), Love Streams
(Cassavetes, 1984), My Night At Maud’s
(Rohmer, 1969), My Sex Life…or How I Got
Into an Argument (Desplechin, 1996 – this is my sole pick that really goes
out on a big limb), The Passenger
(Antonioni, 1975), Play Time, That
Obscure Object of Desire (Bunuel, 1977), The Umbrellas of Cherbourg (Demy, 1964). Of those, Late
Spring was number 15 in the new poll, and Play Time as I mentioned was at 42; the others just got a handful
of votes, if any. But lots of voters were far more iconoclastic than I would
have been. After all, my list illustrates one of the insurmountable problems –
I probably wouldn’t have voted for Citizen
Kane, but only because of another Welles film I like even more. From a
tactical point of view, list-wise, it’s way better for a director to have
one preeminent achievement than to divide admirers between too many
masterpieces.
Vertigo versus Kane
So it basically seems hopeless to me to probe the list for any
broad meaning. Still, as I mentioned, all kinds of people had a good time with
it. For example, Aisha Harris in Slate
advanced three theories: that “Vertigo can be seen as more
closely aligned with today’s cultural climate than Citizen Kane’s largely male-centric realm,” that
“any overwhelmingly lauded figure or work of art is going to eventually face
backlash,” and that “while Welles’ classic is technically innovative, it rings
hollow emotionally.” But this all implies a much more conscious and unified
judging process than actually existed, as if Vertigo and Kane were
facing off before the Supreme Court. Actually, given the expanded voting pool, Kane received more votes than last time,
regardless that Vertigo received even
more more votes. Elsewhere on the Slate website, Alyssa Rosenberg noted
the absence of female directors and opined: “women directors are working in
genres that are simply never given the same critical respect as male-dominated
genres…Nora Ephron's best movies may live in the hearts of audiences forever,
but I'd be surprised to see the Sight
& Sound critics give her space on their ballots.” Well, there are
plenty of reasons why Sleepless in
Seattle didn’t make the list, but gender-driven snobbery isn’t one of them:
Avatar, The Dark Knight Returns and Porky’s didn’t make it either.
Which makes the point that although voters were
allowed to apply any criteria they wanted, the group wouldn’t have put much
emphasis on popular acceptance. I find everything in the top ten completely
entertaining, in the sense that watching them is a completely enveloping and
satisfying experience, but I’m not sure that was true for all of them on first
viewing. As reactions to The Artist
illustrated, silent cinema – which encompasses Sunrise, Man with a Movie Camera, and Passion of Joan of Arc - is unknown territory for many. Ozu is one
of my favourite directors, but it takes time to ease into his worldview. Even Vertigo used to be widely regarded as
one of Hitchcock’s lesser films (judged purely as a narrative machine, it might
seem to dawdle) and I can imagine many viewers being rather mystified by it.
But if you have any inclination to acclimatize yourself to cinema as art, and
time to seek out writers and commentators who can facilitate your reactions,
these ten films form a terrific place to start.
Wonderful Times
In one sense at least, we’re living in wonderful
times: when I first became aware of this exercise around 1982, the listed films
were just names – unless they happened to turn up on TV (and most of them
wouldn’t), you could only dream of them. But this time, I already had eight of
the ten on DVD, and I’d watched a ninth just a few months earlier on cable;
this prompted me to order the odd one out (Man
with a Movie Camera – and even then, it’s not so long since I saw it); I owned
thirty-five of the top fifty, and I don’t believe any of the fifty is
unavailable. Really, for people who love cinema, this poll might provide enough
new ideas and intentions and desires to rewrite their schedule for the rest of
the year.
No comments:
Post a Comment