(originally published in The Outreach Connection in June 2006)
Richard E. Grant (from Withnail and I) makes his directorial debut with Wah-Wah, based on his own experiences
growing up in Swaziland in the run up to independence in the early 1970’s.
Gabriel Byrne plays the boy’s Jekyll and Hyde like father (the difference being
the drink), Miranda Richardson his mother, and Emily Watson his stepmother
after the first marriage falls into bitter oblivion. The film is pleasant and
affectionate, but its basic reason for existing is a bit thin. The value of the
project would seem to be in what it might have to say about the effect of
colonialism on Africa, but the movie barely sets foot outside its toodle-pip
British enclave (the title is Watson’s disparaging label for all the mannered
baby talk), filling its time with largely familiar family dynamics. You feel
happy for Grant that he got to make what resembles a dream project, filled with
genial if conventional performances, but I doubt it’ll do that much for anyone
else.
A Prairie Home Companion
Since Robert Altman is now 81, there’s
always the possibility that each film he makes may be his last, and he keeps
delivering sublime endnotes – the much underrated Cookie’s Fortune and Dr. T
And The Women, Gosford Park, and now perhaps best of all, A Prairie Home Companion. I’ve never
heard Garrison Keillor’s radio show, and can only imagine what resonance the
film might hold for fans, but even taken in isolation it’s immensely rich and
satisfying. The premise is that Keillor’s radio show is broadcast live every
Saturday evening from a Minnesota theatre before a live audience, and it’s the
last night – the developers are moving in. Meryl Streep (who is quite
wonderful), Lily Tomlin and Woody Harrelson (who will make you chuckle more
than you should at a series of dumb dirty jokes) are among the musical
performers. Moving between on- and back-stage, Altman’s camera is in constant
elegant motion, showcasing his undiminished powers of composition and
coordination: it’s simply a beautifully executed work.
The film also features an angel who stalks
the fringes of the show, played by Virginia Madsen. This is the film’s most
criticized aspect, and indeed initially seems more than a little contrived. But
with the arrival of Tommy Lee Jones (as the theatre owner, roughly representing
the devil) the film’s cosmic aspirations take shape, and it becomes persuasive
as an evocation of the spiritual stakes inherent in art. The theatre
encompasses all of life – the characters spill out stories about their
histories (perhaps true, perhaps not, but all related with conviction), a
veteran performer dies backstage, Streep passes on the torch to her daughter
(played by Lindsay Lohan). But Altman is realistic too: there’s no magical
redemption here, and the characters’ status in the film’s epilogue is quite
uncertain. Altman’s compositions make much use of mirrors, so that the images
often have a potential probing intensity, but always leavened by the recurring
grace and delight. Writers have questioned over the years what all of Altman’s
virtuosity actually amounts to, but surely this can be laid aside now: he is
just terrific at being old. This may not be the year’s best release (my own
favourites so far are Cache, The New
World, Gabrielle and The Proposition)
but it’s probably the one I just plain loved watching the most.
Live and Become
On that subject, the summer’s big movies
have mostly seemed to me even less interesting than usual (in fact I went all
through June without being attracted to a single one of them, until Superman Returns at the very end – and
more about that soon), but the limited releases have been just terrific.
Another fine film, which hung out at Bayview for weeks on end, is Live and Become (Va, vis et deviens),
directed by Radu Mihaileanu, about the growth to adulthood of a young Ethiopian
boy who’s evacuated to Israel in the 1980’s under a false identity, leaving his
mother behind in a refugee camp. It’s most interesting, and feels most closely
observed, in the early stretches, showing the boy’s difficult integration; as
it goes on, it becomes increasingly episodic (he’s on a kibbutz, then in Paris,
then in combat, etc.) and even a little hackneyed at times. The filmmaking, in
most respects, is merely conventional, and the analysis of Israel is not
particularly piercing. But this is a truly stirring, moving case history, and I
can’t imagine it not holding your attention.
Michael Cuesta got some attention a few
years ago for L.I.E., a film of risky
moral material (a middle-aged pedophile, presented straightforwardly and with
some tolerance) that established a distinct and somewhat eerie sense of its
Long Island setting. Cuesta now returns with Twelve and Holding, revolving around three young kids – the twin
brother of one is killed, another tries to pull back from the brink of obesity,
and another experiences her sexual awakening. Cuesta is obviously skillful and
sensitive, and the film is well crafted, but it’s also increasingly
melodramatic, pushing each of its plot strands to extreme if not grotesque
lengths. The film remains grounded though – events that in other films would
emanate operatic tragedy always seem here like symptoms of the reticent
turbulence of kids stumbling for their place in the world. But for all its
interest, there aren’t many moments in Twelve
and Holding that fail to evoke other, overall more impactful treatments of
such life passages.
The King
I was surprised though how James Marsh’s The King gripped me. Early on, a young
man called Elvis gets out of the Navy and presents himself to a righteous pastor
as his son by a long-ago liaison; the pastor acknowledges the fact, but wants
nothing to do with him. Elvis hangs round the neighborhood, living in a fleabag
motel, and slowly starts to insinuate himself into the pastor’s family, through
his naïve teenage daughter. It’s a nasty tale, although so meticulously handled
that this may not dawn on you for a while; the nuanced portrait of
fundamentalism really held my attention and intermittently made me think I was
watching a film as good as Junebug.
Gael Garcia Bernal is perfectly ambiguous as Elvis, William Hurt is fascinating
as the pastor, and the film expertly withholds some shocks you expect while
hitting you with a few you don’t. I suspect some may read this and think me a
sucker, but Marsh made me a willing one.
Andy Garcia directed and stars in The Lost City, a would-be epic about the
disintegration of a well-to-do Havana family as Castro comes to power. It’s
moderately interesting, but very familiar and very slow moving; numerous scenes
recall in particular the Godfather
movies, not at all to the advantage of Garcia’s film. Bill Murray hangs around
the film’s edges, cracking jokes; he’s so badly integrated with everything else
that it seems almost like wayward genius. Almost.
No comments:
Post a Comment