(originally published in The Outreach Connection in April 2002)
Did you realize that most weeks, six or
seven movies open in Toronto? Even if only one or two of those were worth
seeing, it’d be pretty hard work. Most weeks I go at least twice, and I always
feel I’m missing out on something. But lately I crammed in a few more than
usual (long weekends are a blessing). So here’s a departure from the norm:
capsule reviews of no less than five recent movies.
Death
to Smoochy
A satire of children’s television, with
Robin Williams as an embittered, fired kiddie TV host vowing to get even with
the good-natured guy in a rhino costume (played by Edward Norton) who now fills
his time slot. The movie doesn’t go much further than the concept – there’s no
particular satiric point to it, and it doesn’t come close to the kind of
territory that would make it memorable on its own terms. The big set pieces –
like Norton’s inadvertent appearance before a Nazi rally – are all either
reminiscent of other, better films, or else indifferently executed, or often
both. And this is one of those movies where the bad guys suddenly turn nice,
men and women who hated each other fall in love, and the world turns out almost
as pleasant as a Barney song. The film should have been at least twice as
convinced of its own nastiness. Still, it’s appealingly put together in a
brash, hermetic kind of way, and if the obscenities aren’t half as creative as
in a Kevin Smith movie, the odd one still gets an easy laugh.
Festival
in Cannes
Henry Jaglom has made a string of
small-budget, intimate, intriguing but somewhat rambling movies (detractors
consider them whiny and trivial). He also deserves some appreciation from
movie-lovers for his steady championing of Orson Welles – although you’d be
hard-pressed to see much direct Wellesian influence in his own work. Jaglom
fans (and I’m one) should be delighted with this new film, and others will find
it a pleasant time-killer. A tale of deal-making (both financial and of the
heart) during the 1999 Cannes Film Festival, the movie is a bit more focused
than usual for the director – the long philosophical exchanges and
direct-to-camera talking heads are sidelined here. But the movie feels like his
– sometimes strident actors like Ron Silver are coaxed into the director’s
distinctive style of leisurely, amiable naturalism. The plot seems to run out
of steam toward the end, but maybe that’s Jaglom’s comment on the
sustainability of such a crazy industry. With more than 12 films in the last 20
years though, he’s obviously not being treated too badly by the financial
fates, and indeed has the taste not to bite the hands that feed him.
L.I.E.
The title stands for the Long Island
Expressway, a grim stretch of highway saved from anonymity only by its high
celebrity death count. In the faceless surrounding neighborhoods, a teenage boy
negotiates ambiguous relationships with his wealthy but possibly corrupt
father, his sexually ambivalent friend and the jovial local pedophile (an
intriguing characterization by Brian Cox). This is mildly daring material,
declining to pass obvious judgment on its numerous flawed characters,
suggesting that this cold face of American life may demand a severe
reassessment of conventional morality. Ultimately though, it wraps up rather
too neatly (how many films have this fault I wonder?) – and it may not be too
much more at heart than an oblique manifesto for better-integrated families and
communities (the end of the film could be read as a mere sweeping away of
deviancy). The film is sternly crafted and always engrossing, although it’s
never as intellectually bracing as it intends, and the frequent symbolic return
to the highway seems more limiting than liberating.
Suspicious
River
Canadian director Lynne Stopkewich’s
follow-up to Kissed screened at the
Toronto Film Festival in 2000 and opened in the UK long ago – it finally creeps
out onto a single screen at the Carlton. How could we treat our own filmmakers
so badly? It’s a good movie and deserves to be seen. The story of a small-town
motel receptionist who prostitutes herself to the guests initially seems rather
thin and monotonous (and it takes a while to appreciate the subtlety of Molly
Parker’s performance), but gradually expands into more complex, gripping
territory. A subplot about a little girl who observes her parents’ unhappy
marriage holds the surprising key to the film. Its last twenty minutes almost
have the feel of Mulholland Drive
about them – life and death, fantasy and reality intertwine disquietingly, and
it’s not clear exactly where the film ends up. That’s not a complaint though –
the film feels intuitively right, coaxed from a troubled but defiant psyche
that alternates between idealism and pessimism about female sexuality. It
occasionally carries an almost zombie-like quality, perfectly capturing the
deadening contours of the small town. Kissed
received more recognition and praise, but I found Suspicious River more deeply felt and compelling overall.
Admittedly I’m overpraising it a bit here, but that’s just my token attempt to
remedy the way the film’s been treated.Last Orders
And I saw Panic Room too! But more on that next time.
No comments:
Post a Comment