(originally published in The Outreach Connection in October 2002)
This is
the fifth of Jack Hughes’ reports from the 2002 Toronto Film Festival.
9-11-01 (Amos Gitai, Youssef Chahine, Sean Penn,
Mira Nair, Claude Lelouch, Ken Loach, Shohei Imamura, Danis Tanovic, Idrissa
Ouedraogo, Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu, Samira Makhmalbaf)
Eleven
short films by eleven directors from eleven countries, taking vastly different
approaches toward the basic mandate of commemorating/commenting on September
11. Under the circumstances, it’s remarkable how subtly balanced it feels as a
whole (compare to the other anthology package at this year’s festival, Ten Years Older: the Cello, in which the
broad subject of “reflections on time” failed to inspire most of the
participants to anything worthwhile). Penn and Lelouch both provide intimate
stories of loss taking place in the shadows of the twin towers – Penn’s is
especially lyrical and surprising. Tanovic, Gitai, Loach and Chahine contrast
September 11 to other atrocities. Chahine’s piece, weaving in fantasy elements
and evoking past American atrocities, is a particular reason why the project’s
been accused of anti-Americanism; his segment is unfortunately the clumsiest of
the bunch. Loach much more cogently contrasts 9-11-01 with 9-11-73, on which
the Chilean army (with American backing) rose against the elected Allende
government. Inarritu immerses himself in the event itself, generating a
shocking aural collage against a mostly black screen. Makhmalbaf and Ouedraogo
see the event through the eyes of children in Iran and Burkina Faso
respectively – Ouedraogo’s piece, about five boys who think they’ve spotted
Osama bin Laden, is especially engaging. Nair’s story of a woman whose missing
son was wrongly accused of being a terrorist is one of the less subtle
contributions. The movie ends with a typically weird story from Imamura, set in
Japan after Hiroshima and apparently relevant to September 11 only in the very
general sense that it points out the horror of war. All in all, the film places
9-11 in context without diminishing it; only the most supremely self-righteous
could seriously object.
The Eye (the Pang Brothers)
Screening
as part of the festival’s Midnight Madness section, this horror chiller almost
blows all its energy on a great opening tease in which the film seems to be
burning in the projector (“Bummer,” said the woman behind me). A young blind
woman receives a cornea transplant, but she now sees not just people from this
world, but also from the next. The opening aside, the film is best when
establishing the initial creepy mood (Kiyoshi Kurosawa may have been an
influence for some of this, but The Eye
is a more calculated, straightforward entertainment than his allusive genre
work). The more it gets into plot mechanics, the more it loses its initial
grip, although it regroups for a good finale. Other strong elements include a
sympathetic heroine, a pounding music score, and general technical finesse. I
never see more than one or two of the Midnight Madness selections every year,
and this is par for the course – better than average genre fare, but not really
deserving of the sobriquet “madness,” and not likely to keep a weary
festival-goer awake past midnight. Fortunately for me, I saw it at 11 am.
Ken Park (Larry Clark & Ed Lachman)
Larry
Clark seems to regard himself as the prophet of some dismal truth about teenage
suburban America – they have sex, they take drugs, they’re alienated and
screwed-up to the point that they could kill you as easily as look at you. And
by the way, the parents are no better. Ken
Park (the title refers to a character who shoots himself in the head at the
start) doesn’t even have as much plot as Kids
or Bully – it’s perhaps the ultimate
undiluted Clark experience. Ironic then that he has a co-director here for the
first time, but maybe noted cinematographer Lachman mainly contributed to the
film looking more proficient than Clark’s previous work. A plot summary would
sound like no more than a list of sleazy fantasies. The most interesting aspect
of this is in how the adults are deeply unnerved/threatened by/envious of the
kids’ sexuality and set out to appropriate it for themselves, thus
precipitating the very consequences that they claim to fear. If they left the
kids alone, everything would work itself out. The film then does have some
thematic merit, and some real sadness. But Clack ups the ante of explicitness
with every movie he makes, and it’s awfully hard to get past that surface.
L’homme du train (Patrice Leconte)
A
charming anecdote about an aging bank robber who comes to a small town to pull
off a job and crosses paths with a retired poetry teacher living a faded
bourgeois life (“except for needlework,” he says, “I have all the skills of an
early 20th century woman.”) They develop a mutual envy and each
starts to move in the other’s direction: the gangster starts wearing slippers,
reading poetry and smoking a pipe; the other fantasizes about being a tough
guy, and gets a new haircut (“somewhere between ‘just out of jail’ and ‘world
class soccer player’”). The amazingly facile Leconte keeps generating these
beautifully constructed, nicely shaded curios at the rate of one a year (they
include Ridicule and The Widow of St. Pierre). Like Louis
Malle, he thinks his way picture by picture, and will never make it into the
pantheon of auteurs, but he’s the best there is nowadays at the archetypal
well-made foreign film. This one has an effective steely gray texture, lots of
good one-liners, and ideal performances from Jean Rochefort and Johnny
Hallyday. On the debit side, it’s overly schematic, and sentimental too in the
end.My Mother’s Smile (Marco Bellocchio)
No comments:
Post a Comment