(originally
published in The Outreach Connection
in December 2003)
Master and Commander
Peter Weir’s films
generally evidence a painstaking interest in communities placed under threat,
often combined with a sense of the otherworldly. These meld most fruitfully in Fearless, my favourite film of his,
about a man who survives a plane crash and then finds his relationship with the
world transformed. Psychologically, the film is about denial and delayed
reaction; in its impact, it’s almost like The
Sixth Sense, studying someone who might literally be a ghost snatching some
unsustainable last gasp with the world. At other times it’s a scrupulous
examination of the activity that surrounds such an accident. Fearless was a commercial failure, but
Weir’s list of successes is estimable: Gallipoli,
Witness, Dead Poets Society, The Truman Show and others.
Master and Commander: the Far Side of the
World, based on Patrick
O’Brian’s much-admired series of seafaring novels, continues Weir’s
anthropological investigations. Russell Crowe plays Jack Aubrey, captain of a
British ship in the early 19th century, far from home in the South
Pacific on the trail of a French vessel from Napoleon’s army; Paul Bettany is
the ship’s doctor, his closest friend. The plot is basically just a series of
encounters with the enemy ship, but the film’s substance is its evocation of
life on the ship. It’s not a small achievement to evoke monotony and stasis
while avoiding becoming merely monotonous and static, and Weir seems here like
almost the ultimate craftsman. His film has immense physical and visual impact,
without ever being overbearing in the manner of recent Ridley Scott.
Crowe is the film’s
dominant presence, but he doesn’t overwhelm it: the captain is clearly the
ship’s leader, but still a functionary of the Empire, subject to institutional
constraints. He flogs an insubordinate sailor because the code demands it,
without any Bligh-like relish. Events take the ship to the Galapagos Islands,
at this pre-Darwinian point largely unexplored and undocumented, where the
sense of an unspoiled evolutionary bubble provide a graceful counterpoint to
the ship’s contrived but coherent society. This is the main outlet here for
Weir’s more ethereal interests. All in all, it’s not surprising that Master and Commander has been a relative
disappointment at the box office – for a big-budget epic venture, it’s
remarkable intimate.
21 Grams
The title of
Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu’s English-language debut refers to the body weight
that’s supposedly lost at the moment of death, and the film is to some extent a
meditation on how normal life, placed in proximity to death, breaks down. Sean
Penn plays a professor whose life is saved by a heart transplant; Benicio del
Toro is a career criminal who finds Jesus; Naomi Watts is a wife and mother
whose life collapses when her family is killed in a hit-and-run accident. All
three suffer considerable anguish, and of course their stories eventually
intertwine. The film is told in a highly fragmented style, switching madly
between plot lines and points in time. Some critics have suggested that if the
stories were told in a linear style, the film would seem like litte more than
overwrought melodrama.
Which is neither
here nor there – by what weight is profundity ever separated from banality?
Around 21 grams at the most I guess. On its central theme, the film isn’t as
subtly paradigm-challenging as the aforementioned Fearless. It’s a big film with big gestures, but its biggest idea
lies exactly in the manner of its telling. Near the start there’s a beautiful
shot of birds taking off, silhouettes against a deep sky, suggesting the film’s
trajectory – it circles events like an aerial visitor caught in a gale, first
making out strange details that only gradually cohere as it fights to a
landing.
It also has big
acting, acting of transformational power that’s central to the film’s fabric.
The three main performances have a grungy contour we recognize as realism, but
in an outsize way that facilitates Inarritu’s quasi-epic ambitions. 21 Grams is easy to criticize in various
ways, but few films this year have matched it for sheer power.
Gothika
Halle Barry hasn’t
exactly used her Oscar as a catapult to more challenging material: X2, Die Another Day, and now the horror
film Gothika, which is the English
language debut of French director Mathieu Kassovitz. Kassovitz is making his
own voyage downmarket (but, undoubtedly, up-pay cheque) – from La haine via The Crimson Rivers to Gothika.
Berry plays a criminal psychiatrist in a creepy old institution, married to the
boss (Charles S Dutton), worrying about the case of a woman who insists she’s
continually raped in her cell (Penelope Cruz). One night, driving home in a
thunderstorm, she has an accident, and wakes up to find herself on the other
side of the bars, locked up after murdering Dutton. The explanation for this
belongs not to this world.
Gothika’s main point of interest lies in its vague glimpses of a feminist
theme. The way that Berry reevaluates the plausibility of Cruz’s claims after
finding herself in a parallel situation seems to be a stand-in for a broader
notion of how a legitimately different female reality may be dismissed as mere
hysteria. But, of course, the movie is generally a matter of sound and fury.
It’s difficult to get caught up in a story where ghostly intervention allows
for so much lazy, arbitrary plotting; still, it has enough grim diversity to
avoid boredom. Berry is, I would say, stoic. Kassovitz does much the same
directing job he did on Crimson Rivers. Everyone
involved should have been doing something better, and it’s inconceivable they
don’t know it.
Bad Santa
For me, the title of
Terry Zwigoff’s Bad Santa evokes Abel
Ferrara’s memorable (especially if you’ve seen the uncut version) Bad Lieutenant, which means I was
looking forward to something wildly offensive. Well, not so. Sure, this
shambling comedy about a drunken low-life store Santa (whose annual grotto gig
always ends up in him and his midget sidekick cleaning out the safe) occasionally
raises half an eyebrow – mainly via references to Santa’s sexual practices. But
this runs out of juice pretty quickly, and then the film spends way too much
time on the fat kid who gradually warms his heart, and thus becomes yet another
glossy self-actualization treatise. When I saw it, the crowd initially seemed
primed for laughter, but got quiet pretty fast.
A big part of the
problem is that Billy Bob Thornton (who, you’ll recall, is a wiry, laconic kind
of guy) doesn’t look or behave like any kind of Santa to begin with – the physical
mismatch really undercuts the material’s transgressive edge. The movie’s only
raison d’etre would have been to go to the very edge of the envelope and then
keep going – it probably needed to be debauched beyond reason. Zwigoff (who’s
been complaining about studio constraints, but doesn’t seem to have been going
that far out to begin with) was much better suited to the more gently surreal
explorations of Crumb and Ghost World.
No comments:
Post a Comment