(originally
published in The Outreach Connection
in October 1998)
In What Dreams May Come, Robin Williams
dies in a car crash and ascends to heaven, while his grieving wife kills
herself and gets sent to hell (mandatory for suicides – them’s the rules).
Williams bravely sets out across the divide, to find her and bring her to join
him in Paradise (rules aside, getting into heaven’s apparently largely a matter
of who you know). As I often like to say, place your bets now on whether he makes
it or not. But I was well-primed to identify with Williams’ quest, because I
recently had to search for my own wife, on a Saturday afternoon in the Eaton
Centre. Oh God, the crush, the airless horror of it all. I was sure I was
condemned. But I found her, and somehow we escaped, maybe not with our souls
intact, but with most of our money.
My lost soul
A facetious response
to a crucial spiritual concept, you say? Perhaps that’s right. I am, quite
certainly, a bit of a spiritual wasteland. I’m happy to admit ignorance of all
the big questions, but also to admit a blithe disregard for them. Whenever I go
to the zoo, I’m struck by the inadequacy of evolution as an explanation for
such strange, weird beauty, but I lack the faith to believe in a single Creator.
So I just amble along, presuming I know nothing.
In much the same
way, I tend to shy away from any talk of “vision” or “soul” or any of that
intangible inspirational stuff. My ideal image of myself, I suppose, would be
as an easygoing pragmatist. I just like to get things done, in my own way, with
the minimum bother to myself or to others. I’m amiable, I think, but not at all
touchy-feely – actually I don’t much like to touch anyone at all except my wife
(who must apparently have been on good form this week to deserve all these
mentions), and I’d rather reserve all sentiment for the same recipient. As you
can see, I don’t mind talking about myself to some extent, but the more
superficial the better.
I’ve set all this
out as a comprehensive acknowledgement that I’m not the ideal viewer for What Dreams May Come. It’s not that I
couldn’t warm to the setting of heaven and hell, if there were some point to it
– surrealism, or allegory, or whatever. In fact, one of my favourite films,
Jean Cocteau’s Orphee, moves
deliciously between this world and the next. In Orphee, it’s really the weird specificity that’s so compelling –
the juxtaposition of outlandish mythology (mysterious messages received on a
car radio; mirrors that act as portals to hell) with moments of rustic comedy
or mundane potboiler. The spirit world’s emissaries zoom around on motorcycles;
the angel Heurtebise hangs around the house in an open-necked shirt. Orphee consistently evokes the
strangeness of the creative muse in a way that’s still fresh and alluring.
Armageddon
In What Dreams May Come the only point
seems to be size (it’s the Godzilla of sappy couple movies). With all the
kindness I can muster, I can’t see the relationship between Williams (in one of
his distinctly dull modes here) and his wife (played, sort of, by Annabella
Sciorra) as more than a self-important, patently fake Hollywood invention. It’s
all puffed-up talk, ponderous looks and confessions, enacted in one dreary
flashback after another. Despite all the wet dialogue about their rare status
as true boundary-crossing “soulmates,” the film conspicuously fails to evoke
mutual delight, scintillating rapport, or any of the qualities that might send
a man more than, oh, a few blocks in search of a missing spouse. It’s rather grotesque
to elevate the attempted reunification of this mediocre pair to the level of
Most Momentous Love Story in the History of Creation. If it were Bogart
laconically trekking through a maelstrom of evil in search of Bacall, I might
have considered it.
Be warned too that
Williams’ journey, after all the build-up, isn’t actually that onerous. One
might have thought that penetrating Satan’s empire would entail enough
resistance to require, at the very least, the assistance of a Bruce Willis, but
it turns out to be primarily a matter of achieving a state of mind that
transcends all obstacles. This is convenient for the filmmakers, of course,
because if there are no objective rules or limitations on their chosen
universe, they can make any narrative leaps they like, at any point, without
worrying about the normal stumbling blocks of causation and plausibility. The
strange result is that it’s apparently far easier to engineer the meeting of
lovers across heaven and hell than to pull off the same thing in, say, Boston
(the setting of the current Next Stop
Wonderland).
Chicken Soup for the Vegetarian
I should acknowledge
that the film has another selling point – its computer-generated depictions of
the next life. When Williams wakes up in heaven, his surroundings have the
consistency of paint; they threaten to melt away as he touches them. It’s a
beautiful depiction of his fantasies and dreams made real, still fragile in
their newness. The film’s concept of hell is a bit more generic, but still
undoubtedly unappealing (although a film less concerned about the family
audience might have turned up the evidence of pain and suffering a bit, or
might at least have trotted out a few more lawyers and accountants). Some
critics think the movie’s visual qualities compensate for any weaknesses in the
storytelling. My own view on that: if a story’s not worth telling, it’s not
worth telling beautifully.
What Dreams May Come is one of the year’s most pretentious
movies, somewhat laughable in its hunger for grandeur. But as I said, I’m not
the spiritual type. The only one of those inspirational “Chicken Soup” books I
might consider buying would be “Chicken Soup for the Chicken” (in the hope of
bleak cannibalistic irony). Still, despite my distinctly earthbound soul, I’m
lucky enough to know a little bit about love (there’s that woman again) and
this film failed that basic test of recognition. I would have forgiven it all
its missteps in depicting the big celestial canvas, if it were only truer in
capturing the small intimate one.
No comments:
Post a Comment