(originally
published in The Outreach Connection
in February 2002)
An overdue mea culpa
– I used to bash Pulp Fiction fairly
often in these pages, usually as an example of an overrated triviality
illustrating Hollywood’s loss of direction and higher purpose. I haven’t
mentioned it for a couple of years at least now – maybe a sad sign of the
effect of Quentin Tarantino’s Kubrick-like deliberation over his next project
(out of sight, out of mind). But I watched the film again the other day, for
the first time since it came out, and felt quite ashamed of my early carping.
Sure, there’s a lot in it that’s self-indulgent, wantonly brutal and violent –
the sheer confidence can become grating. But I think I vastly underestimated
the film’s formal intelligence. It’s a remarkable mix of fluent storytelling
and of longeurs that would be deadly boring, if not for Tarantino’s amazing
ability to soak in the nuances and idiosyncracies of a particular situation.
Rewatching Pulp Fiction
Time and character
and normal concepts of causation and motivation seem almost infinitely mutable
and extendible in Tarantino’s hands – he strips the story down to its bones and
lays them bare while simultaneously investing in them a stranger and more
scintillating life. And even the mythic ambitions, Jackson’s quoting from the
Bible and the strange suitcase and the guy in the basement and so forth, seemed
much more compelling to me this time, validated by Tarantino’s almost
transcendent mood and structure.
Best of all perhaps
was the film’s extreme, glowing romanticism, especially in the sequence between
John Travolta and Uma Thurman: it takes two extreme, nerve-ridden personalities
and forges a real connection between them – before blowing it away again. As
with the relationship between Tim Roth and Amanda Plummer, there’s no question
that Tarantino believes in love even under extreme pressure, but he’s also
aware of how malformed and objectively crazy the resulting relationships might
be. In all, a great film, and I apologize for all my cheap cracks. It may be
time now to look at Fight Club again
as well.
Anyway, just thought
I should get that off my chest. Pulp
Fiction was of course an astonishing career resurgence for Travolta –
there’s a real spontaneity and emotional nakedness in his work there (as well
as fine, unpredictable comedy timing) and he should probably have won the Oscar
for it. Since then. He’s been as great in such works as Primary Colors, She’s so Lovely and Get Shorty. But lately his work has severely waned. He was the best
thing in Battlefield Earth, but his
performance made only slightly more sense than the movie as a whole. In Swordfish he seemed complacent, bloated
from too many early paychecks. I didn’t see Domestic
Disturbance (why would anyone?) I doubt that much of interest will come
from him in the near future.
The Shipping News
For a while,
Travolta was attached to the film version of The Shipping News, but it didn’t work out and the role passed to
Kevin Spacey. At this point, I think we should probably be grateful. When I
think of Travolta in The Shipping News,
my mind keeps defaulting to Demi Moore in The
Scarlet Letter. But the gratitude is strictly relative, for I think the
film would have been better off without Spacey too. Also without Julianne
Moore, Cate Blanchett, Judi Dench and the rest of its starry cast.
I haven’t read the
book, but based on all accounts and on what filters through the film, it’s a
fairly raw account of a physical and emotional unfortunate. The film is
generally wistful – which is exactly the adjective that best applied to
director Lasse Hallstrom’s last two films, The
Cider House Rules and Chocolat. The Shipping News is much better than Chocolat, which seemed to me entirely
inconsequential and manipulative. But there’s a frosted quality to it that
holds most emotion at length.
Spacey plays a
widower, lifelong deadbeat and father of a young girl who comes with his aunt
to Newfoundland, the home of his ancestors. Although he has no journalistic
experience, he finds work on the local newspaper, writing the shipping news. He
slowly develops a relationship with a local widow played by Moore.
The film is
inevitably very pictorial, but in the manner of a travel brochure, with bits of
local eccentricity and legend dotted throughout. I don’t think it conveys the
feel of Newfoundland nearly as well as New
Waterford Girl captured the similar feel of Cape Breton. The comparison is
instructive – for New Waterford Girl
was a cheap, homely film with the confidence to experiment. Hallstrom’s biggest
problem as a director, by far, is his adherence to traditional notions of
accessible, sensitive storytelling. He is, very likely, the polar opposite of
Quentin Tarantino is just about every way possible. You don’t get the sense
that Hallstrom could possibly be enjoying himself that much on the set – he
makes everything feel so strenuous.
Experimentation wanted
This doesn’t create
the best environment for actors to do their best work. Hallstrom’s films have
done well lately on scoring Oscar nominations (and a win for Michael Caine in The Cider House Rules), so the Academy
doesn’t agree with me. But he plays safely into our expectations. Spacey gives
a wounded puppy kind of performance; Moore is radiant. Both actors are too
intelligent to convey the tentativeness that their characters seem to require.
Most everyone else in the film looks too good (the authentically drawn and
worried-looking Pete Postlethwaite, as a nasty colleague of Spacey’s, being the
main exception).
There are real pleasures in the film though. I liked the depiction of Spacey’s growing confidence as he learns to work with words; how he finds a real personality in conjunction with an artistic one. The ensemble acting around the local paper is usually amusing. But the romance between Spacey and Moore seems distinctly undramatic. Except for some minor disagreement at the start, they’re always moving toward each other. In general, everything seemed overly compressed to me – the film should surely have been longer.
Actually, I’d like
to see Quentin Tarantino direct something like The Shipping News. That sounds crazy, but he’ll surely never top
what he’s done already in the lowlife stakes – and the long creative silence
suggests he knows it. Pulp Fiction’s
exquisitely tender and dreamy sequences between Bruce Willis and Marta de
Medeiros showed Tarantino could maintain a softer mood without losing his head.
He should give that part of himself a more extensive workout. The appeal of
experimentation only goes so far though, for I have no desire to see what Lasse
Hallstrom does with a Pulp Fiction-kind
of script.
No comments:
Post a Comment