(originally
published in The Outreach Connection
in December 2001)
Just as The Last Castle retreats from theatres (a clear box office failure), Robert Redford
returns in Spy Game – clearly a
shrewder commercial calculation if only because it only stars Brad Pitt. I
wrote a couple of weeks ago of my bemusement at The Last Castle’s lack of much significance. In Spy Game, things are a little clearer –
the movie is superficial, and doesn’t care who knows it.
It may not have
helped me that just before going to Spy
Game, I’d been watching The Lost
Honor of Katharina Blum, the 1975 German film about the interrogation and
media hounding of a young woman who’s been having a relationship with a wanted
anarchist. Katharina Blum isn’t
perfect by a long shot – it’s very strong on the portrayal of the woman and the
ambiguous implications of her interactions with the system, but has
substantially less finesse in how it bangs the drum against the gutter press.
In a case like this though, the flaws are no less integral to the film’s
ability to provoke. It’s a film of unquestioned serious intent, with the
overall facility to support that ambition.
Katharina Blum
Katharina Blum is a contemporary of the golden age of
Redford’s career, when he made The
Candidate and All the President’s Men
and Three Days of the Condor and The Way we Were. One might forget how
even that latter film, the memory of which tends to be shaped by its sappy
title song, spends considerable time tracking the workings of the McCarthy era.
It’s as if there was a brief period when entertainment could hardly avoid being
challenging. Now flash forward. Katharina
Blum was co-directed by Volker Schlondorff, who in 1979 would win an Oscar
for The Tin Drum. In 1998 he made the
Woody Harrelson potboiler Palmetto,
at which time he seemed ready to renounce his former achievements. Schlondorff
said: “I want to be more like my brothers who are doctors – just do the
operation.” He said of Palmetto
specifically: “It’s unabashed trash, and I’m fully conscious of that and it’s
guaranteed to have no deeper meaning.”
Since then,
Schlondorff has again made a more serious film, so maybe it was just a phase he
was going through. But his case is just one of hundreds that would make the
same point – that there’s been a pervasive loss of ambition in cinema. Mulholland Drive, which continues to get
better and better the more I think about it, is one of the very few films this
year that suggests a multiplicity of interests on the part of its maker.
I know I write about
this subject too much – like a voyeur that keeps creeping back to the scene of
the car wreck. I just can’t get away from it. If I hadn’t written about Spy Game this week, I probably would
have taken on Novacaine, an utterly
lackluster film that fancies itself to be a daring amalgam of film noir and
black comedy. The film evidences no grasp at all of cinema past, present or
future.
Spy Game
Anyway, Spy Game was directed by Tony Scott,
whose last movie was Enemy of the People
– a tremendously fast-moving and stylish piece of work that tapped very ably
into our neuroses about being watched and manipulated and outwitted. Spy Game isn’t as fast moving (except for
rather odd moments when the film suddenly seems to start running quicker
through the projector) and doesn’t have as strong a structure. Redford is a CIA
mission director, one day short of retirement, whose protégé (Pitt) is in a
Chinese prison, one day short of execution. Realizing the Agency has written
Pitt off, Redford puts together his own rescue plan, while the movie flashes
back to the greatest hits of their time together in the field. It’s a rather
oddly organized movie, suggesting a lack of both focus and confidence.
The action takes in
Vietnam, Berlin, Beirut and China – without displaying an iota of specific
interest in any of those locales. The film builds to an incident that has the
potential to be immensely destabilizing to US-China relations, but then it ends
before we know what comes of it. It’s one thing when a popcorn movie conjures
up some cartoon version of a rogue state; Spy
Game evidences enormous research and care for visual authenticity, but then
has no use for it beyond the usual shootouts and set pieces. It’s actually
rather unnerving. Other aspects of the film add to the sense of a skin that doesn’t fit the
beast. For example, the casting (Charlotte Rampling, David Hemmings, Marianne
Jean-Baptiste) is superbly imaginative – far too much so given how little these
actors actually have to do. The fact that virtually all of Pitt’s part takes
place in flashback gives his entire role a feeling of dislocation.
But it’s Redford’s
presence that most clearly drives this home. How could he have been content to
deal so superficially with this material? For sure, this film is a better
vehicle for his charisma than The Last
Castle – he radiates ease and assurance. It looks like being on the set was
barely any more effort for him than being at home – although with all his
varied interests, maybe Redford’s days at home are pretty hectic. Unlike most
of his media-shy contemporaries, who’ve gradually crept onto Leno and
Letterman, Redford still keeps his distance from the media. It’s a shame,
because we could use his help in figuring out what the hell he’s up to here.
Amelie
I have no idea what
the Oscar contenders will be this year, except perhaps that Amelie looks like a good shot for best
foreign film. Some people might regard this film as exactly what’s needed to
cure a movie grump like me – a surefire crowd pleaser with at least half a
brain in its head. The title character is a shy witness who intervenes in
various peoples’ lives, but has trouble going after the man she desires. The
film is sometimes widely expansive (when Amelie wonders how many couples in
Paris are reaching orgasm at that particular moment, we’re taken on a quick
ride through fifteen heated couplings) and sometimes intimate and whimsical.
One has to admire
the thought behind it all – the film gives the impression of hitting every
target for which it aims. Whether they’re the right targets is another
question. Lead actress Audrey Tautou is perfectly sweet, but might seem rather
one-note in a less adept film. And sometimes it’s just too contrived to care
about. Still, although there have easily been better foreign films this year,
this is probably the one that American voters will feel takes them on best at
their own game. But like Robert Redford, Amelie is a long way from the depths
of Katharina Blum.
No comments:
Post a Comment