In some ways, Chris Hegedus and D. A. Pennebaker’s fascinating
record of a 1971 debate on woman’s liberation issues, Town Bloody Hall,
is a museum piece from a more pugnacious, unfiltered age, overflowing with larger
than life public intellectuals, with not an apparent thought given to the
all-whiteness of the proceedings. Perhaps it’s a bit depressing then that much
of it still seems so relevant, or maybe it’s to be strangely celebrated that we’ve
yet to reach the state of stifling boredom that Norman Mailer (the evening’s
moderator!) predicts would attach to a fully-achieved feminist agenda. That
agenda is set out early in the movie by the National Organization for Women’s Jacqueline
Ceballos: it’s sobering that many of her points – equal pay, paid maternity
leave – seem both as sensible and as incompletely unachieved now as they did
then. But the debate (at least as the movie presents it, editing down a three
and half hour event to less than half that time) spends little further time on
such matters, mostly wrestling with more primal matters of self-definition and
connection. And it’s Mailer who provides some of the more direct points of
lasting connection: for instance, his remark about the potential violence done
to a man who suppresses his desire to hit a woman doesn’t sit too well on its
own terms, and yet feels now like a harbinger of the cultural backlash so often
evoked in explaining the appeal of Trump to white men, and to the white women who
define themselves in relation to them. That’s just one example of how one
watches the film with a sense of steps taken and others back – to pick some
random examples, it’s unlikely that someone like Diana Trilling would ever be
introduced now as a “lady critic,” but then there’s barely any mainstream space
now for the breed of critic/thinker/theorist on show here, whatever their
gender.
No comments:
Post a Comment