(originally published in The Outreach Connection in April 2009)
The new film Sunshine Cleaning isn’t a big deal, but
it’s an honest portrayal of getting by in hard times, entertaining and
moderately enlightening without being frivolous or preachy. The raw materials
are highly familiar. Virtually every critic pointed out the filmmakers’
apparently overt desire to replicate the success of Little Miss Sunshine (see repetition in title, and Alan Arkin
playing another flavourful grandfather). The focus on two sisters, one always
having to take care of the other, heavily recalls Curtis Hanson’s In Her Shoes (which I know itself
reminded me heavily at the time of something else…) And so on for much else in
the movie.
Sunshine Cleaning
Amy Adams plays
Rose, a former cheerleader, now working for a cleaning service, bringing up her
son alone, having an affair with a married cop. He tunes her into the lucrative
crime scene clean-up business – removing bloodstains, organic matter: the dirty
job someone has to do but no one ever thinks about. She pulls in her younger, disruptive
sister Norah (Emily Blunt) and things take off quickly, although they only
learn the basics along the way (for example, that you can’t merely throw
everything into a dumpster). As you’d imagine, there are reversals; as you’d
also imagine, they mostly get by them.
The film starts
with a suicide in a gun store, and the residue of past tragedies marks it
throughout. In one scene a bewildered old woman waits for them outside the
house where her husband killed himself; the inside is full of post-it notes
bearing day-to-day instructions he’d written to himself, presumably trying to
ward off Alzheimer’s. There doesn’t seem to be much mobility – Rose still runs
into girls from high school, usually doing better than she is, but living in
the kind of prettified excess that we know embodies the tapped-out American
consumer. It’s a scrupulous film about these kinds of things, and convincing in
such things as Rose’s approach to her affair (and, for that matter, in the
camera’s approach to her as an attractive woman, but in a way bearing no sign
of Hollywood make-over).
In a way, the
film’s trajectory represents the more “creative,” self-sufficient society we’re
often told represents our best way period – through a bit of luck and
application, you find a niche and move into it. One worries the number and
variety of these niches is much smaller than the hopes attached to them (how
many people really make a good living selling things on Ebay, or from
developing their own websites?), and the film – although obviously written and
filmed a while ago – taps precisely into the credit crunch’s threat to
heartland entrepreneurism: good ideas need financing, maybe a lot of it.
Unpretentious Integrity
All of this is
still uncommon enough in mainstream cinema that Sunshine Cleaning projects an unpretentious integrity. I also liked
director Christine Jeffs’ (she’s best known for the rather grim Gwyneth Paltrow
movie about Sylvia Plath) subtly assertive approach to her female protagonists
(both very well acted by Adams and Blunt). At the end, Rose may be on the verge
of entering into a new romance, but the film couldn’t present that much more
offhandedly; Norah’s sexuality, meanwhile, seems somewhat ambiguous. Either
way, the film seems to avoid the common trap, as someone (I forget who) put it,
of suggesting that even strong and capable women only find their fulfillment in
the eyes of a man.
In other ways, the
film is pretty minor. The writing isn’t that bracing. Arkin seems mostly to be
doing shtick, only tenuously related to the rest of the film (albeit pleasant
enough to watch). The subplot about the sisters’ deceased mother (also
reminiscent of In Her Shoes) pumps up
the renewal/ redemption aspect perhaps a bit too much. But you still come out
way ahead. In the end, Rose’s commercial prospects are on a momentary upturn,
but only by ramping up the personal risk. Still, things being what they are,
it’s more promising than her earlier ambition, to become…wait for it…a real
estate agent). Meanwhile, Norah is on the road, and it’s tempting to think that
Wendy & Lucy takes up the story
from there.
Sin nombre
Still, Sunshine Cleaning is much more
optimistic than not; it generally (albeit cautiously) supports the premise that
America is large and diverse enough to afford an answer to almost every
personal crisis; or failing that, remains better than most alternatives. Sin nombre, directed by Cary Fukunaga,
has lots of momentum and energy, but the only even vague prospects, it seems,
lie to the north. A family from Honduras heads up into Mexico, aiming
ultimately towards family in New Jersey. In Chiapas, Mexico, a young gang
member falls out with the other members. The narratives cross paths,
murderously; now the gang refugee travels with the Hondurans, but pursued by
his former brothers, seeking blood revenge.
The film is
undeniably gripping; it’s a much more kinetic piece of cinema than Sunshine Cleaning. Anthropologically,
it’s fascinating at every step, whether illuminating mass deprivation (the
familiar juxtaposition of natural beauty increasingly receding from layers of
squalor and sprawl), the grasping at faint hope, or gang habitats and rituals.
This last element, though, also embodies reservations about the high dependence
on melodrama and manipulation. The lead performances feel authentic and deeply
felt, but the movie does feature a lot of unlikely, big-screen-worthy behaviour
and a lot of sleazy, strutting violence. It’s impossible, from this
perspective, to know how much this reflects an outsider’s quasi-romantic
impositions on a sadder and duller reality (Fukunaga is an American), but it’s
hard not to have suspicions. In this sense, the film falls under the same broad
umbrella as Slumdog Millionaire,
although in comparison with that picture’s irresponsible excesses it feels like
the work of Robert Bresson.
The film only
provides the briefest glimpse of America at the end – an anonymous big box
landscape that might as well be on the moon compared to what we’ve seen
previously. Sin nombre doesn’t damn
South America exactly, but it doesn’t spend much time illuminating its virtues
either – throughout there’s a feeling of heat and claustrophobia and confusion
and threat; a volcano either spewing people out or swallowing them up.
Certainly the contrast with American urban commercialization is striking, but
it’s also easy; it’s disappointing not to come away with a more piercing
aftertaste. Still, we can again provide our own extrapolation, that with much
work and relative luck, the journey of Sin
nombre might connect somewhere with that of Rose in Sunshine Cleaning, and however temporarily, her problems would seem
like victories, the kind of bourgeois worries available only to those nearer
than it feels to the top of the global pyramid.
No comments:
Post a Comment