(originally published in The Outreach Connection in April 2009)
One problem with
movies about organized crime, if you’re not part of that scene in real life, is
that it’s hard to gauge their authenticity; often, of course, their main
reference points seem to be other movies, and if it’s not that, then it’s
usually a stylized minimalism often seeming to be constructed mainly on the
imperative of not referencing other
movies. Certainly the gangster life is disproportionately covered in movies
compared to most others; and while these films frequently claim social
relevance, they’re usually relevant (if at all) in the same narrow way.
Gomorra
Matteo Garrone’s
Italian film Gomorra belongs broadly
to the category; incorporating five intertwined plot lines, it examines the
reach and impact of the Neapolitan Camorra. Some of the behaviour seems
familiar too – the strutting, preening, swaggering, gun waving. But Garrone
escapes the genre quicksand, in part by showing how cultural images and clichés
bamboozle the criminals as much as anyone else. A group of overweight
gangsters, pampering themselves in the spa to get sleek and tanned, are
suddenly blown away. A couple of perilously immature guys who think they’ve
absorbed the ghost of Al Pacino in Scarface
are obviously heading for a correction. There’s little sense in the film that
much of anyone is getting seriously rich (except maybe a businessman who builds
his waste disposal practice on circumventing environmental regulations, but
then business occupies a different echelon, right?)
Around this,
Garrone’s portrayal of the environment is detailed, convincing, and utterly
grim. One of the main hubs of the action is a frightful, decaying apartment
complex of the kind that might have represented some post-war urban planner’s
shallow dream of a fusion between living and public space, with walkways and
courtyards and open-air swimming pools. Now it merely evokes the geometry of
hell. The police are mentioned, but seldom seen – the main social safety net is
the Camorra itself, doling out (inadequate) weekly benefits for past services
rendered and ongoing loyalty (there’s not much of a sense of what if any
legitimate work goes on). In one scene we see a wedding party marching along
one of the covered walkways; even such a life transition can’t escape the
oppression (it sadly contrasts a brief scene where the businessman and his
helper visit Venice, and comment on how all life’s rituals take place on the
water).
Working Boots
The film overflows
with intimations of human and toxic waste. The businessman, trucking hundreds
of poisonous canisters into landfills, explains he merely helps people get
things done within a stifling regulatory system. In the last shot, we watch
corpses carried away. There’s barely a “beautiful” shot in the movie. And
Garrone explicitly tags globalization as a big piece of the engine. Everything
costs double since the Euro came in, says one woman (negotiating a higher price
for leasing out one of those landfills).
Perhaps the most
intriguing of the storylines has a tailor, working for a factory partly
financed by dirty money, secretly providing lessons at night to a Chinese
competitor. On the other side, the assembled sweatshop staff greets him like a
king, and he’s well paid for it, but of course it’s a perfect capsule for how
the West only wins the short term game by giving away up the long term one.
Near the end, he stares at a TV showing Scarlett Johansson on a red carpet in
one of his creations; a very direct connection to the good life, but so distant
as almost to mock his own – still, at least his life goes on. Other strands
follow an aging functionary who delivers the mob welfare program, and a kid
taking the first steps into deeper involvement (and it’s implied, a very short
likely existence from there). One of the film’s minor virtues is in not
saddling all this with the kind of over-plotting (coincidences;
inter-connections) tending to mark such structures; the links here are more
implicit, and of course more devastating for that.
Gomorra’s virtues are in the working
boots category: it’s powerful, well judged, and relevant. This is also to say,
it’s not quite transformative. We should be severely worried about escalating
urban hellholes and about increasing gang crime, but it’s not yet so bad that
fixating on the latter doesn’t still represent a choice of sensationalized
local threats over monumental systemic ones. After coming out of Gomorra, there’s not much you can do
other than shake your head and hope it never happens to you...but at least
that’s a plausible hope for most of us, for now anyway.
Cadillac Records
Darnell Martin’s Cadillac Records came out in December in
the US, but only had a few scattered repertory screenings here during February;
it’s now on DVD. It’s the story of Chicago’s Chess Records, founded by Leonard
Chess, a Polish immigrant. Seemingly oblivious (at least in this telling) to
colour barriers, Chess started out with Muddy Waters, hit it really big with
Chuck Berry, and provided Etta James her first big platform (as well as,
perhaps, his secret affection).
The movie, for the
most part, functions in affectionate tribute mode, moving smoothly through
twenty years or so in just an hour and three quarters. The music scene always
having been what it is, there’s womanizing and overdosing and violent scuffling
and premature dying; Martin treats it mostly matter-of-factly, as the price of
revolution. At the start, the records are labeled “race music” – the crossover
is Berry, inventing a new era as effortlessly as comics fire off one-liners.
Even after becoming famous, he sleeps in his car on tour to avoid patronizing
segregated motels; his concerts have a rope down the middle to separate the
black audience from the equally enthusiastic white one, until it breaks down.
This is perhaps more about feeling good than about meticulous history, but the
movie occasionally hits harder; a scene of harmonica pioneer Little Walter
getting beaten up by the cops couldn’t be much more in-your-face.
It’s surprising
the movie didn’t get more play if only for its cast, especially since it has
Beyonce Knowles as Etta James, a little bulked up and earthier than usual both
in her singing and her acting (as James, she sings the same At Last she memorably sang the day of
Obama’s inauguration). Mos Def makes a colourful Chuck Berry; Adrien Brody as
Chess, though, embodies the movie’s blander aspects.
But maybe that’s
useful, in service of an ongoing suggestion of various manipulations behind the
scenes; royalties being diverted from one performer to another, and a
paternalistic attitude by Chess (preferring to provide the talent with cars and
perks rather than actual cash) perhaps hiding some murkier bookkeeping. It kind
of makes you miss the days when a little friendly corruption might be the price
of genuine social and cultural progress.
No comments:
Post a Comment