(originally published in The Outreach Connection in June 2002)
With hindsight, of
course, we can identify all the major wrong moves of cinema history. Peter
Bogdanovich has been profiled a lot lately, on account of making a modest
comeback with The Cat’s Meow. It once
seemed impossible a comeback would ever be necessary. In 1973, after The Last Picture Show, What’s Up Doc and
Paper Moon, he ought to have been
unstoppable. Three years, three bad films, and much obnoxious behaviour later,
it was all but over. How much has he wondered since then about the road not
taken?
Michael Ritchie is
a less dramatic and perhaps more interesting example of how the course of a
career can change. In 1978, James Monaco’s book American Film Now profiled him (along with Cassavetes, Altman,
Coppola and Mazursky) as one of five leading contemporary directors. The Candidate, Downhill Racer and Smile had established him, but Monaco
noted with mild concern that Ritchie’s most recent film, Semi-Tough, was blander and less stimulating. After that, Ritchie
made a few films in which you could vaguely see thwarted ambition (The Island, Diggstown) and a whole bunch
of pandering, silly work (The Golden
Child, Cops and Robbersons, A Simple Wish). The decline appears
inexplicable, and almost deliberate. To my knowledge, Ritchie never expressed
regret over it.
Career Lows
On the other hand,
it’s long forgotten how Steven Spielberg stumbled early on with 1941 and then recovered his footing
within a couple of years with Raiders of
the Lost Ark. For that matter, just about all the big directors have a flop
in there somewhere, but they get over it.
I remember someone
saying that it’s incredibly hard and soul-destroying to make any movie, even a
bad one, and then just a relatively little bit harder to make a good one. I’ve
often wondered what it must feel like to invest yourself into a film for a year
or more, to traverse all the thousands of decisions that go into it, and then
to have it rendered instantly dead by a few bad reviews. I bet you didn’t know
that Johnny Depp directed a movie some years ago. Called The Brave One, it even had Marlon Brando in a starring role. The
film premiered at the Cannes festival in 1998, but got a horrible reception and
has barely been released anywhere. But if those initial viewers had reacted
differently, then maybe Depp would have gone on to direct again; maybe he’d be
known now as much for directing as for acting.
Of course, this
kind of speculation applies as much in any walk of life – we can all pinpoint
key moments of fate or choice where, with retrospect, the direction of our
lives shifted. It’s just that cinema, even more than the other arts, seems to
have a remarkable number of under-achieving careers festooned across its
history. To me this reflects its collaborative nature, the logistical
challenges in realizing a vision – compared with say writing novels, it’s much
more likely that one might simply run out of energy, or suffer plain bad luck.
Behind the Sun
Which brings us to
Woody Allen’s Hollywood Ending.
Although it seems by now as if Allen has been in decline for as long as anyone
can remember, it’s only this film and his last, Curse of the Jade Scorpion, that truly scrape the bottom of the
barrel. Through his glory days in the late 70s and 80s, Allen communicated his
dissatisfaction with mere comedy, letting it be known that his ambitions lay in
greater things. He seems to have given that up now, but the flair’s all gone.
It’s not just the movies – his recent humour pieces in The New Yorker struck me as unreadable, and his brief return to
stand-up at the Oscars wasn’t much of anything.
One can stab at
explanations – for example, he’s not working with the same creative team that
sustained him for years. But you only need to look at Woody himself. He’s not
even in touch with his own film. He gesticulates and stammers and does his
shtick, but it’s sealed off in a vacuum. Hollywood
Ending has the gimmick of Woody playing a director who goes suddenly blind,
so he can’t look anyone in the eye. It’s appropriate in more ways than one.
That’s already
enough on that. Walter Salles directed Central
Station a few years ago – a Brazilian film about the relationship between
an old woman and a little boy. The film was sensitive and well-handled,
although somewhat soft-centered for all its grit (recent South American smashes
Amores Perros and Y tu Mama Tambien have made this even
clearer with hindsight). After that, I kept reading how Salles was going to
make an English-language project, though nothing’s come of it yet.
His latest film Behind the Sun looks largely like
marking time, although it also has a pandering quality about it that makes you
wonder if it wasn’t conceived as a calling card for the studios. Two poor
farming families carry out a deadly blood feud that gradually depletes their
ranks. An eldest son is granted a month’s truce until the other family comes to
kill him. He runs away and falls in love with a traveling circus performer, but
then feels he must return. The film is baked in acrid yellow dust and
glistening skin – it’s undoubtedly handsome.
Pull the plug?
But nothing in it
really matters. The film attends to its grand mythic scheme at the cost of much
immediate electricity. It has a distinctly flat quality, and lacks much of a
pay-off. I’m not saying it’s a failure exactly – I think it’s possible that
Salles achieved almost exactly what he was going for. Behind the Sun is substantially better than Hollywood Ending – it’s immaculately professional. But maybe, of
the two, its failure leaves you the more somber. At least one can rationalize
Allen’s film as coming at the tail-end of a career, after dozens of better
memories gone before. Even if Hollywood pulled the plug on him now (and they
haven’t – he has a new project shooting currently), we could be confident we’d had
the best already.
And yet – it’s not that long since Deconstructing Harry and Sweet and Lowdown – not Allen’s best, but not disastrously far-off either. If Robert Altman can make Gosford Park at 76 and Manoel de Oliveira can make movies at 94, should we give up on Allen yet? True, he feels further gone than Altman ever did, but cinema is full of surprises.
No comments:
Post a Comment