Blue Collar, Paul Schrader’s
first film, might not be easily identifiable as a Schrader film if you didn't know: for long
stretches of time it almost feels like something arising organically from the
factories and the surrounding community, particularly from the male workers who
navigate between profane self-assertion and constant losing-battle
economic anxiety. This doesn’t mean it feels like documentary – it increasingly
submits to the mechanics of the plot and to the journey toward its final
cinema-fist freeze-frame – but much of the movie carries an enormous
feeling of ease and almost unmediated expression, with all three lead actors as
fine as they’ve ever been. The film explores the complex equilibrium of the
worker – at once proud of the union and what it represents but mostly
contemptuous of the specific individuals who embody it; adhering to a
traditional role as head of household while constantly on the lookout to
subvert it with drugs and available women; sensitive to criticism and
accusations of fallibility while constantly aware of their circumscribed place
in the system. It’s a gripping film from beginning to end, but inevitably now
it’s the sociological aspect that holds sway, given the subsequent decline of
such labour-heavy production methods, and its consequences for the kind of worldview and
social infrastructure Schrader explores. The film’s treatment of race is also
notable: the film’s protagonists - two black and one white – are joined by what
they have in common without being suspicious of what they don’t, until their
unity poses a threat to the system, and so must be not just broken, but
converted into active hatred. That ending freeze-frame isn’t subtle, but
watching the movie now, it’s like a portal to the toxic present, in which such
communities are plundered for easy votes, with never a shred of economic
concession or compassion given in return.
Friday, June 8, 2018
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment