I doubt that many unprompted viewers could identify
The Coca-Cola Kid as the work of the
director of
Sweet Movie, especially
as they’re only separated by one intervening film (
Montenegro). The earlier picture is outrageous, shocking and
compelling, taking its celebration of freedom to unsettling extremes,
constantly asking us what price we’re willing to pay for it, and apologizing
for nothing; in contrast,
The Coca-Cola
Kid timidly opens with several screens’ worth of disclaimer regarding its very
title. The movie sounds in summary like a satire – an American whizzkid “fixer”
comes to Australia, his focus entirely on monetization, only to become
sidetracked by local oddities and temptations – but the focus is obscure, and
the sainted brand gets off pretty lightly. Where
Sweet Movie revels in sexuality, the fixer spends most of the movie
trying to avoid it; his eventual change of heart in this regard seems
under-motivated, a product of movie calculation rather than ideological
triumph. The film focuses, strangely, on something that would seem tangential
at best: the fixer’s fixation on bringing Coke to the one region of the country
from which it's excluded, a local magnate monopolizing the market with his own
brews, but the resolution of this too is grim and murky, certainly not allowing
much in the way of symbolic victory. Perhaps then the main point of the film
lies in this very sense of defeatism, in positioning such global brands and
infrastructures as essentially impervious to meaningful mockery, or even to
normal narrative forces and influences: the closing caption tells us that the
following week in Japan the next world war began, which might appear only to
acknowledge that the whole movie has been an exercise in looking in the wrong
place, for the wrong thing. In that sense it draws nicely on Australia’s
established peculiarity – as a place that looks exactly like the West, while
gradually revealing itself as being stubbornly and unyieldingly Other.
No comments:
Post a Comment