Nelly Kaplan’s last feature film, Plaisir d’amour,
works an enjoyable if not ultimately too surprising variation on a
self-gratifying male fantasy. Guillaume (Pierre Arditi), a practiced seducer
(1,003 past conquests, we’re informed), chances into a position as tutor to a
teenage girl on a tropical island; the girl is absent when he arrives, but
while waiting for her arrival he separately beds, with little difficulty, her
grandmother, mother and sister, all of whom share an elegantly dilapidated
colonial mansion, with no male authority figure in sight. He figures he’ll step
into the driver’s seat, but his attempts to impose greater order and efficiency
get nowhere, and he becomes obsessed with the perpetually delayed girl (whose
letters home and readily accessible diary indicates a psyche of a sexual
rapaciousness that outdoes his own). The film suggests greater moral stakes
through glimpses of fighting between the island’s army and its rebel faction,
and through its late 1930’s setting, with WW2 percolating in the distance; and steadily
muddies the sexual waters (both the women’s eccentric servant (Heinz Bennent)
and their talking parrot appear to regard Guillaume as an object of desire);
frequent references to Albert Einstein and a fanciful opening sequence throw in
some scientific and mystical resonances as well. In the closing stretch, it
becomes clear how little power and agency Guillaume has had throughout – he tips
over into quasi-madness, and becomes a simple nuisance, his utility spent. It’s
in no way a major film (not the equal of Kaplan’s La fiancée du pirate, which is much more zestily provocative on its own
terms, and more broadly resonant as a social critique), but it’s an
elegant one, even if a lot of it plays very conventionally and decoratively
(there’s seldom a moment when any of the women seem to be behaving entirely
naturally, albeit that this fits in with the artificially heightened nature of
things).
No comments:
Post a Comment