Eric Rohmer’s Rendezvous
in Paris could almost evoke a rather plaintive response – the work of a man
in his mid-70’s, immersing himself in protagonists four or five decades younger,
obsessively examining and reexamining the mechanics of love and attraction, as
if in search of something that tragically got away. The film’s sparseness – it
was made under extremely minimal conditions, with just a handful of closing technical
credits – gives it the sense of a modern pilgrimage of sorts, albeit that the
site of the pilgrimage is on the doorstep, the city of Love, inexhaustible
fount of pleasure, frustration and complexity. The film’s three segments are
all, in the broadest sense, triangles: Esther suspects that her boyfriend
Horace is seeing someone else, and then by chance meets the someone else in
question; an unnamed woman, her relationship with her long-time partner on the
rocks, meets an unnamed man in a series of locations, unwilling to take things
beyond a certain level; a painter is set up with a Swedish visitor and takes
her to the Picasso museum, but then finds his attention drawn to someone else,
ending up without either woman. Rohmer’s genius with such material lies in his
extreme attention to detail and awareness of contingency, for example of how
the slightest change in the existing dynamic or equilibrium might disrupt
something that might otherwise have tenuously held together; the film’s final
scene points to how one never knows what may live in the memory, or may count
as a compensation. Regardless that the characters are mostly living fairly
basic lives, financially speaking, it’s hard not to view the film as a kind of
aspirational fantasy, in which disappointments and compromises are as
intoxicatingly necessary as the moments of fulfilment, all of it a reason to
keep walking and talking and flirting, and ending things and beginning others.
No comments:
Post a Comment